In early July 2008, Samuel Alito stood on a riverbank in a remote corner of Alaska. The Supreme Court justice was on vacation at a luxury fishing lodge that charged more than $1,000 a day, and after catching a king salmon nearly the size of his leg, Alito posed for a picture. To his left, a man stood beaming: Paul Singer, a hedge fund billionaire who has repeatedly asked the Supreme Court to rule in his favor in high-stakes business disputes.

Singer was more than a fellow angler. He flew Alito to Alaska on a private jet. If the justice chartered the plane himself, the cost could have exceeded $100,000 one way.

https://www.propublica.org/article/samuel-alito-luxury-fishing-trip-paul-singer-scotus-supreme-court

    • wagesj45@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      impeach and remove. or we should just stop listening to them. they don’t have an army to enforce their rulings. not that any left leaning president* would have the balls to do so, but it would be the moral thing to do at this point.

      • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s no mechanism iirc.

        I want it to happen to, I want them to have to report to an ethics committee yearly and if something smells fishy (and this time a little bit like salmon) they should have a trust vote by the American public.

    • TheDeadGuy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it any wonder? The money will always try to influence politics and the Supreme Court is the smallest number of individuals with power besides the president. Get a few on your side and so is the law

  • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Alito said that he was invited to fly on Singer’s plane shortly before the trip and that the seat “​​would have otherwise been vacant.” He defended his failure to report the trip to the public, writing that justices “commonly interpreted” the disclosure requirements to not include “accommodations and transportation for social events.”

    This is such an insane defense. Yeah, this casual acquaintance of yours just got you a $100k personal flight for the giggles.

    • Snapz@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      He didn’t just “put out his own statement”. Propublica reached out to him for comment on this article, he didn’t respond and then he scrambled to have an op-ed published in the Wall Street Journal hours later (always worth saying that that is a Rupert Murdoch owned company). It was a poor attempt at damage control by a weasel trying to get ahead on spinning the narrative.

  • demvoter@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    When the Thomas bribery story came out, Elie Mystal said something like, “You’re telling us that this justice can handle the most complex legal cases but doesn’t understand ethics laws?” Same applies here. They didn’t think they would get caught.

  • Drusas@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is quite a thorough and damning article. It’s infuriating how openly corrupt some members of the supreme court are. Even more infuriating that they get away with it, and that almost certainly won’t change because the wealthy own this country.

  • Snapz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wonderful journalism, wow. I will say that it did take too long to read that Leonard Leo planned/coordinated the whole trip. This Supreme Court is so fully out in the open fucked.

    In a legitimate society with a sliver of integrity this would not be tolerated.

  • Fauxreigner@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The really telling thing is, I skipped this article the first time because, “Yeah, we know, this isn’t news.” Took me another look to catch that this was Alito, not Thomas.

    • Toxic_Tiger@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Must be really depressing when a crooked Supreme Court Justice story comes out, and there’s more than one possibility for who is referring to.

      My condolences to America tbh.

    • Snapz@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re going to ever say, “yeah, we know…” you should take a moment to acknowledge that was the exact strategy of bombarding the public with a constant stream of scandal, crime and controversy - to numb you to real issues like this, worth actual outrage and attention.

      I know it’s overwhelming, I feel it too, but I work to not indulge that feeling when I can avoid it. Glad you came back a second time and read the article.

  • livejamie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Alito seems untouchable, there are dozens of stories like this about him and his wife.