• AbsentBird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 days ago

    But also, how far can low light sensitive cameras see into the sky? Maybe a couple miles with some sort of telescopic optics? The F35 can attack from beyond visual range using its 100 mile range radar system.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Sky coverage is just a matter of replicating one telephoto unit a couple hundred times or whatever to cover the horizon. Clouds are a game-breaker in the optical frequencies - when they’re there.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Up to the horizon (and actually slightly past due to lensing). The setting sun is a perfect example. Sure, it’s brighter than a single fighter aircraft, but as long as you have double digit individual photons to work with the game hasn’t changed theoretically, and light collection technology is right around perfect at this point.

      Continuous cloud cover messes up that calculation pretty good, though. If this kind of system was seriously deployed today we might see pre-WWII tactics and strategies coming back to exploit that. In practice, sensor fusion in all kinds of bands is the name of the game, and what will probably make stealth aircraft obsolete eventually.

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        Sensor fusion is another F-35 feature. Elon seems to think visible spectrum cameras are all you need. Even if you could capture a couple dozen photos reflected off a fighter jet from miles away, how could you reasonably know it’s speed, distance, and location like you get with radar?