Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

Zuck: Just ask.

Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

[Redacted Friend’s Name]: What? How’d you manage that one?

Zuck: People just submitted it.

Zuck: I don’t know why.

Zuck: They “trust me”

Zuck: Dumb fucks

No it’s the person who owns the source.

A pro-Israel American iirc.

For one, it bases it’s bias assessments on American politics. The UK is less right-wing than the US but when this bot comes along it calls a source which we might call centrist, “left”.

In a way, it’s like an attempt to shift the overton window for other countries closer to the US, and that’s not a good thing.

Of course, don’t expect this to be addressed by @Rooki@lemmy.world.

People offered plenty of constructive criticism in that thread:

The mod ignored it and only replied to positive feedback.

Another one for the graveyard!

Yep the Pinetime can last for about 2 weeks on Infinitime in my case

This. Freedom is part of the quality of a program.

This is exactly what it does. It steals code and does not abide by it’s license.

Often it also removes or changes the license/attribution.

You love to see it.

Isn’t it funny that people always see their own depictions of idols, afterlifes, etc?

No. It’s religious quackery.

Okay, I get it. It makes a lot more sense now. Honestly your first comment was word salad.

It has it as a setting. It should be default though

???

I mean, there’s a reason there are so many distros. They’re for different needs.

Some people seem to prioritise a little convenience above absolutely everything else, which leads to Ubuntu, but people like me want proprietary software to burn in hell, so we wouldn’t use Ubuntu. Ubuntu is not suitable for our needs. It also wouldn’t be suitable for having an easily customiseable OS, which a lot of people like.

Yeah I know that’s allowed under the GPL, but you mentioned them “choosing to keep a FOSS version”, which if they didn’t do that would mean relicensing. It’s still FOSS here.

Obviously these phones aren’t as good as megacorp-backed Androids yet, they’re much newer and the software is being developed by the community for fucks sake. And the manufacturers haven’t had so many design revisions to recognise and fix all the issues.

They’re development/early adopter devices. And the killswitches aren’t pointless, because while you can enable airplane mode, that’s a software mechanism which can be maliciously changed, either by the manufacturer or an attacker. A kill switch will 100% cut you off.

Aren’t there outside contributors? How can they relicense it without their permission?

To be fair, if the free software “hardliners” like the FSF soften their stance, then that “hardline” just shifts. If nobody maintains that stance the strongest libre software principles will become weaker, if that makes sense.

The FSF is very useful for preventing that, even if they’re not quite as big as softer movements like “Open Source”

So you’re suggesting they remove or tag 99% of projects from the directory because you don’t like where they put their source code? Seriously?

If you really don’t like it, use the git command line to access it… It’s just the server where the code is hosted…

And no, you don’t need an access token to clone a repo.

Yes these sites are bad, no it doesn’t warrant tarring the projects hosted on them.