Zyansheep

Does anyone else see “removed” in this comment? Is the instance editing comments to censor certain words or is it just the user?

Saying its actual reality ignores the fact that reality can change. Especially the ones inhabited by humans.

If they go bankrupt and people move away for newly pedestrianized cities that are nicer to live in, perhaps they will be razed eventually 🤔

Perhaps the guy himself, but his videos are absolutely a wake-up call for people living in cities in the US.

No, Americans are watching the right channel. It is easy to ignore a problem, and to give up on it when you see no alternative. It is much harder to see what could be and then be like: nahhhh, that’ll be impossible to achieve, i’ll just suffer.

Thats not how humans work!

No, he just said AI isn’t like human brains because its a “statistical machine”. What I’m asking is how he knows that human brains aren’t statistical machines?

Human brains aren’t that good at direct math calculation either!

Also he definitely didn’t explain what “lost art” is.

1. How do you know human brains don’t work in roughly the same way chatbots and image generators work?

2. What is art? And what does it mean for it to become “lost”?

Not to mention, what prevents a future release of the feature either turning the percentage to 0% or removing the hold-back entirely?

Imo thats like the main issue here. Google tweaks chromium changing a single number and everything goes to shit. This proposal is a trojan horse!

your devs will just write other server backend code that is forked off of yours that won’t “hold back”.

Isn’t it the client (i.e. the browser) that holds back randomly? The server for any service can’t force clients to send an attestation.

I thought cities in the Netherlands were required to have public transit?

Hmmm… words used in not-satiric circumstances where the true meaning isn’t the intended meaning is a bit confusing…

Hmmm, I guess I don’t like the reasoning “extreme version of complicated idea is bad, therefore the idea is bad in general”. Like its fine to dislike an idea’s extremes, but it would be disingenuous to also dismiss its more moderate forms.

everyone is equal and thus should have equal rights and treatment under the law

Isn’t that like the definition of (clasical) liberalism?

The mechanistic reasoning might be plausible, but is there any actual examples of a modern capitalist society regressing back to some form of feudalism to any significant degree?

The point where I’d be worried is when a single company is the majority of a country’s GDP or has complete control over the government. The only examples I can think of that even get close to these possibilities are South Korea’s Chaebols or Hong Kong’s corporate voting block.

What about capitalism requires infinite growth? And what does it require infinite growth in? What happens when growth stagnates in a capitalist system? Does it suddenly not become capitalist anymore?

So you are defining an ambiguous term in order to better criticise it? That makes sense, but it might not convince people who have different definitions 🤔

Like I for example would consider a Co-Op where the employees own the company / have voting power over how its run to be a part of a capitalist system, hell, I’d even consider someone who makes a living as an artist where they own all their tools to be a part of a capitalist system… although I suppose that could also be considered socialist to some degree because the artist “owns” the means of production?

These definitions are kind of difficult to use…

Hmmm, its those kinds of extreme statements that make me a bit suspicious. Is global warming really an extinction level event? I can imagine terrible civil wars over resources and increasing displacement from natural disasters, but total eradication of the human race is afaik not a possible result of global warming.

I don’t think pure capitalism as you describe it exists, or if it does its definitely not common.

Huh, I use capitalism solely to refer to the first two 🤔

What is egalitarianism?