Three nights minimum in each location. It feels rushed if it’s shorter.

The real problems would be x^m computational issues. A finite number of ai running around on a finite amount of space are linear problems. Basically, very possible

Turing test has been passed by ai just recently as it happens. Our computational load is trivial in the scheme of things

It’s simple - you cheat. In computer games we only draw the things you are looking at, and we only give the appearance of simulating the whole thing but the ‘world’ or universe is actually very limited and you can’t visit most places. Sound familiar?

Heatstroke and dehydration can present as confusion, usually accompanied by anger.

Full remote all the way.

Demand that in your contracts so you have flexibility. Then it’s a choice not an obligation to come to the office.

deleted by creator

Hah even with a woman winning the the Nobel prize for showing it is false the pay gap nonsense persists.

The hardest people to teach statistics to are feminists.

Toshiba oddly enough. I’ve been burnt by the big names like Seagate a few times now.

Hah we are yes.

We can see the number of AIs rising exponentially over time. That combined with simulations rising exponentially means it’s pretty much infinity to 1 odds that we are all AIs in a simulation. 😬

We don’t live in an infinitely complex universe as far as we can see. We live on earth almost exclusively and spinning up a solar system is something we can already do.

Given the universe is pretty big and simulations can be simplified (see Heisenberg uncertainty principle etc) it’s reasonable that you could spin up a ton of concurrent simulations with only a small step up in needed power usage.

You’re also making assumptions about power creation and its finite bounds.

Not your responsibility if a sentient race goes and annihilates itself. In fact it could be considered abhorrent to interfere with it’s natural development and free will.

Hah what if a simulation this complex was spun up and down just to generate a selection of art for your wall? Or some new plays, or TV shows? Or just to see if they can figure out a complex math problem? There’s soooo many applications.

OK counter point here.

As computing power increases the number and complexity of simulations increases. Given that, the chances of us being in the ‘real’ universe scales with the exponential growth of simulations…basically the chances of this being real is about infinity to 1.

Not sure I agree with you on it being unethical.

If you could spin up a planet and have it speed through its entire life (till solar expansion say) then any life on the planet would have lived full, unimpeded lives and I can’t see any argument for that being unethical.

Needs diagrams. This looks kinda close. Works with sound, light, any waves. Basically you can get points where the waves are twice as loud and points where there is nothing

https://youtu.be/D7aftTF--5w?si=9W51TBNh8mr9gcX1

No worries. Honestly a really cool part of physics - worth looking into.

That and being able to project darkness via light ‘wave’ node points always blew my mind. Similar set up too.

Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

Basically ‘stuff’ isn’t actually there till you look.

Not enough guns for you soldier…the plane has them all

Try hitting something past 25m with a pistol. Better chance throwing it or I do anyway.