Yeah, you get it. I aim to trivialize the oligarchy. The idea that we can make the world better at nearly zero cost. The only cost is the therapy bills of the former billionaires, as they work through their butthurt at being reduced to mere opulence.

What fresh hell is this?

I use this whenever my supervisor tells me she has news for me.

I’m don’t love the chart and hate forced and false dichotomies.

Both ‘conservative’ and ‘liberal’ are over-loaded terms, meaning that they can be used to mean too many things, some definitions almost directly contradict each other.

So I stick with the term ‘assholes’, which has a more universally agreed meaning.

I just found this on AliExpress: $112.58 | 1-70mm Wire Stripper Manual Wire Stripping Tool Portable Electric Drill Powered Copper Scrap Wire Peeler Hand Crank

My summer job, apparently.

Listen here, you little shit.

JK, you are correct. I prefer punishingly steep progressive taxation over asphyxiation as a solution.

Then WHY THE FUCK AREN’T WE ACTING LIKE IT!!!

Sir, I apologize for my inappropriate display of emotion. But seriously, I think almost everyone would agree with this statement if asked in a vacuum.

Asking as a person of USA extraction, are you able to comment on the reasons behind the dissatisfaction with Labour that prompt desire for a leftier party?

I am specifically curious if Labor has become a managed opposition akin to Democrats. It wouldn’t surprise me, politics being a global sport, but would appreciate a boots on the ground perspective. That is if you feel up to it.

This is a global fight. If we are going to tax billionaires into non-existence we can leave them nowhere to run. That’s what motivates my curiosity.

Websites work very well and are scalable af. A plugged in person with a track record like that could go Web 2.0 and probably net more.

In all those subsequent roles, I imagine they are all the same universe and Harry’s life just got really random.

What you might want is a permanent easement, as is often used for conservation purposes

Any line from the script to The Big Lebowski.

Thank you for taking the time to write that. That was very well thought out and I really can’t see much or anything to quibble about.

I am a gay man raised in a conservative culture and I really know quite a lot of men in their 30s and 40s who are straight and accepting of me, but still deeply deeply troubled and confused about what it means to be a man. They struggle to identify and articulate their emotions quite a lot.

The fact that those in same-sex relationships have to invent their own ways of dividing the work in a partnership without reference to pre-defined gender roles makes their insight incredibly useful to the world at large. A lot of the struggles that men experience are due to rigid gender roles that do not allow for healthy expression.

I get a little bit angry because it’s like we were expected to accept that provisional approval from the Supreme Court, which as we all know is a very fragile victory.

Why? Because frankly, I think gay men and lesbians have a lot to teach about relationships just by existing visibly. Transgender people do too, but they do not yet enjoy the patchy and tentative acceptance that same sex relationships between cis people have achieved in the large parts of the USA. Their struggle is very intense right now and the LGBQs can help by getting loud again.

Why did we give up on the fight so early? The struggle for existence is not quite as dire for gay and lesbian people as it used to be, but it is still quite a struggle as nothing is assured. But it is not just for our benefit that we must be visible. Frankly, our experience gives us a great deal of wisdom and insight that our society, and men especially, desperately need.

If you really want help, you almost need to dox yourself by giving pretty specific location info. So please don’t do that.

Land matters are very complex in any country. In the USA, laws around land use can vary from one block to another. 50 states and many matters are delegated from each state to their counties for implementation.

My point is, yes, you may be able to arrange such a community.

It can be a tricky legal, political and social affair that is very specific to your exact site.

So plan on a huge learning curve and learning how to find the right kind of legal and organizational advice.

In cybersecurity, this is called red-hat or red-team work. Maybe the search terms will help you find what you need.

“The most notable Fatberg is Lord Eustace Fatberg IV. Lord Eustace had no hobbies as he was a non-sentient amalgam of human waste, wet wipes and fat lodged in a sewer.”

If a person can moderate, I would call it a bad habit and not an addiction. To me, the inability to moderate is what makes it an addiction in the first place.

Me, too.

Can you imagine the creation myths that would evolve in the society that developed from the survivors? There were just a handful who had survived and experienced that descent into hell. The others had blissfully slept.

Pandorum is, to me, what Passengers was trying for. The claustrophobic horror of hurting through the void, other humans being both your salvation and your tormentors, all that.

The execs ruined it to make a vehicle for some big names.

It won’t work on all people, but it will work for the right people!

I mean, if a person has the urge to juggle in public, it means they want to be seen and maybe connect with randos over it.

That’s wholesome AF

Yes, it is.

Do it anyway.