

They have a moat/stickiness because of their immense user count. It’s unfortunately ubiquitous in too many lives.
They have a moat/stickiness because of their immense user count. It’s unfortunately ubiquitous in too many lives.
Well put 👏
Being an Alphabet subsidiary I wouldn’t expect anything less, really.
Europe must cancel its plan to ban new fossil fuel-emitting cars from 2035 to reduce reliance on China’s battery supply chain and play to its technological strengths, BMW’s chief executive said on Tuesday.
Oliver Zipse, who has long pushed for regulators to permit various technologies - including alternative fuels like e-fuels or biofuels and hydrogen fuel cell cars - said the mood in Europe was “trending towards one of pessimism” and the region needed a new regulatory framework to remain competitive.
Absolutely. Improvements has been made, but there is a very long way to go.
Yes. The owners are already wealthier when they buy an EV, and thus they already have the higher carbon footprint. This is not caused by the EV.
But an EV has a significantly higher carbon footprint than public transport, though.
No, it is not. But, while electric vehicles have lower carbon footprint than gasoline powered cars, they have far higher carbon footprint than public transport.
”The researchers found that people who purchase EVs tend to be wealthier than average”
Ad hoc weapons (Vjatsjeslav Mikhajlovitsj Molotov)?
Maybe he could ensemble some sympathisers?
Vibrating smart watch seems to do the trick for me.
Cocoa comes from a seed, not a bean. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocoa_bean
I agree, but one nitpick: they work for us, we don’t work for them.
I didn’t notice until you pointed it out. Thank you kindly.
AI summary: