The mod banning these users is the same mod who made the posts they downvoted. This is mod abuse, turning the downvote button into an auto-self-ban button.

The message is “If you disagree with me, you will be banned”

Monitoring and banning users for using lemmy as intended to signal boost your opinion should be grounds to have all mod privileges removed. This behaviour undermines the integrity of the server and the wider fediverse.

  • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    That probably wouldn’t and would obviously be vote manipulation. This situation is pretty rare and is ignored, like on YouTube, because people get bored and most people wont go out of their way to do this

    Problem is: Lemmy’s algorithm is shit and doesn’t learn from our preferences. If it did, we would see less posts that we dislike

    People just can’t stand being disliked. Should we ban people disliking crypto posts? Because damn most of my posts are disliked based on people hating and spreading lies about crypto just because they dislike it

    People looking for stuff will find it if they want to, no matter the amount of dislikes

    • Blaze@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Problem is: Lemmy’s algorithm is shit and doesn’t learn from our preferences. If it did, we would see less posts that we dislike

      Piefed has keyword filters that can help with that issue.

        • Blaze@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I filtered “musk”, “trump”, reduced the amount of US politics post tremendously

          I might add “kirk” at some point, depending how much it’s still discussed in the coming weeks

          • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            great way to avoid the drama, but there’s a risk of false positives

            I guess you don’t mind it, probably not losing anything of value

            • Blaze@lazysoci.al
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              I don’t even live in the US, so indeed the risk of missing something relevant to me is quite low

    • Skavau@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      That probably wouldn’t and would obviously be vote manipulation. This situation is pretty rare and is ignored, like on YouTube, because people get bored and most people wont go out of their way to do this

      Absolutely, it is rare. But people do it. As I’ve said before, I banned 5 people on the original !television@lemm.ee instance for just downvoting posts repeatedly. No pattern. None of the accounts were active on the community in terms of posting. Some of the accounts had never even posted on the fediverse - they were simply downvote accounts that purely existed to vote negatively on content.

      Problem is: Lemmy’s algorithm is shit and doesn’t learn from our preferences. If it did, we would see less posts that we dislike

      Piefed has much more control here. People can easily just block communities though.