We look at carbon emissions of electric, hybrid, and combustion engine vehicles through an analysis of their life cycle emissions.

  • eltimablo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s still a net improvement, even with the incorrect assumption that everyone’s electricity is equally filthy. Can we as a species please stop letting the perfect be the enemy of the good for like five minutes?

    • pterodactyl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I never said we need to be perfect, you’re dismissing the argument to save your feelings.

      I said we need to drive less. It’s not hard, it’s not perfect, and it’s the centre of most European planning efforts to mitigate climate change.

      Electric cars are and industry solution to an industry problem, they’re not a reasonable response to climate change

      • HelixDab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        It is in fact very, very hard, when your entire country is planned around the automobile. You’re talking about building infrastructure that doesn’t exist, and replanning every single town.

        When I lived in Chicago, I drove once a week, for groceries, because I lived in a food desert. Otherwise I rode my bicycle (yes, in the winter too). That’s not even remotely practical now, because I live in a very rural area.

        Again: don’t let perfect be the enemy of better.

        • pterodactyl@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yes, build the damn infrastructure, now. It’s not about perfect it’s about working toward a minimum viable output and electric cars miss that mark.

          • HelixDab@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I don’t think you have any idea how difficult that is, particularly since the US isn’t a totalitarian dictatorship. There are a lot of factors in play for the average person, and you need to convince that person that they should change everything about their life and pay far more in taxes, for something that a significant percentage don’t believe in or care about. You can’t win with a fact-based argument; you need to successfully appeal to emotion. And so far, climate activists are doing a really, really bad job at that. Getting people to make incremental change is more likely to be effective, even if make reform is needed.

            There’s also a prisoner’s dilemma here; if we bankrupt the country building this infrastructure, and China and India don’t, then not only is climate change not significantly affected, but we also lose economically.