“When you use Signal, your data is stored in encrypted form on your devices. The only information that is stored on the Signal servers for each account is the phone number you registered with, the date and time you joined the service, and the date you last logged on.”

This isn’t an ad, I wasn’t paid for this post. Just to clear the air: fuck facebook, fuck elon musk and twitter, fuck anyone who thinks this is a paid advertisement. I wish I was paid for this shit, I just wanted to spread the word. Thank you. 😀 👍

  • jabakobob@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think Signal is trying too hard to be secure, and they are missing a lot of convenience features.

    For example, you can’t migrate from Android to iOS or vice versa. You’ll lose all your messages and groups.

    Or it’s really hard to export all the photos someone sent you. I get that my iCloud library isn’t as secure, but I really want to make sure I don’t lose those photos if I lose my device. The photos aren’t that sensitive.

    The security notifications are also well-meaning, but hard to make sense of. You sometimes get notifications for changed security numbers, when people change their phone, sometimes folks show up twice in groups, etc. It’s all a bit hard to understand and difficult to use.

    And finally, it seems that messages are sometimes delivered a bit unreliably or with a long delay.

    • ToNIX@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what I always said. Signal only does one thing right, encryption, and that’s it. The rest isn’t great, they kept the server side code hidden for 1 year to implement the shitty MoxieCoin (so Moxie and his friends could get rich) and removed SMS recently.

      I moved to Telegram and the features are so great there’s no way I’ll ever use Signal. If you really need E2EE you can use it in personal chats. For regular chats, the fact that you have access to all your messages from everywhere is really convenient.

      • leanleft@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        unless u can convince everyone to start a private chat… the chats are not private. at all. afaik.

    • Pagpag@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Small price to pay for security. Maybe some small features are worth giving Zuckerberg and friends access to the most intimate personal shit in your life. For me it’s not a problem.

      • htrayl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This attitude results in the app never gaining any traction and losing what traction it had.