• orrk@lemmy.world
    1·
    10 months ago

    2, and by extension 3 and 4

    Hell depending on what this capital class votes for even 1 might be out the window.

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        1·
        10 months ago

        because having some capital class dictate the project is entirely antithetical to having the choice to contribute, even the AI stuff is just being contributed by a few large companies who want it

        • abessman@lemmy.world
          1·
          10 months ago

          because having some capital class dictate the project is entirely antithetical to having the choice to contribute

          Why?

          the AI stuff is just being contributed by a few large companies who want it

          Contributing something because you want it is how free software works.

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            1·
            10 months ago

            yes, and having a subscription based shareholder system is antithetical to this

            • abessman@lemmy.world
              1·
              10 months ago

              Repeating it doesn’t make it true. As long as the code is released under a FOSS license, the development model doesn’t matter.