I am aiming at 60 FPS, but I am struggling to keep it at any settings.

I have performance UI brought up, and I have noticed this. Presets:

  • Ultra -> ~30FPS average, 90% GPU usage, 40% CPU, 65°C
  • High -> ~45FPS average, 80% GPU usage, 30% CPU, 60°C
  • Medium -> ~50FPS average, 40% GPU usage, 30% CPU, 50°C
  • Low -> ~50FPS average, 20% GPU usage, 20% CPU, 40°C

As you can see, I cannot reach 60 FPS in-game even at the lowest preset.

What can I check/do in this case? The Linux binary is being used.

  • pantherfarber@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    The Linux build uses OpenGL so its slow. The windows version through proton will use Vulkan which is much faster.

    • SSUPII@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The fact that it’s OpenGL matters little. It is a misconception that Vulkan is faster. But in this case, their implementation does seem slower.

      • Hydroel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Isn’t it true specifically on Windows, because the Windows implementation of OpenGL is lacking, but false on Linux?

        • SSUPII@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Windows integrates only very early versions of OpenGL (just kept from the 9x releases). Any modern release is implemented by the driver of your 3D accellerator/video card.

          OpenGL on Windows has always been kinda of a disaster (NVIDIA’s a little less, but AMD and Intel’s are just abysmal), DirectX support being more developed is night and day.

          Linux is pretty much OpenGL’s home. But a lot of applications just are not optimized well enough to show it. Vulkan being faster is just because the software using it have cleaner codebases for being newer.