• chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Depends on if you’re using water to include types of water (if, like a maniacal madman, you have mixed Evian, Buxton and Harrogate mineral water into one jug). Then ‘i mixed fewer waters’ or ‘there are fewer waters in that glass’ would be valid.

          To be clear: I’m not the person you replied to, just someone who finds it quite interesting (in the same way that the plural fishes is valid if you’re talking about different species of fish).

          And yes, I know prescriptivism is bad, but also it is quite fun.

          • stoly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Those are homonyms. Water versus waters. The second one is metaphorical.

            I did enjoy your comment and you sound like you’ve had some linguistic training.

            • chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Eh, you wouldn’t use the noun water to refer to atoms of water. ‘How many waters are there?’ to refer to atoms of water is the statement of someone deranged

              • aidan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Water only exists as atoms. There is no non-discrete water, it is inherently in reality discrete.

        • aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I believe there are about 55.508435 moles of H2O in a liter of water at sea level (basically assuming 1 liter of water = 1kg of water)

            • aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Atoms of water are measured in moles. Atoms are discrete units, a mole is just a certain number of them

              • stoly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                So you understand then why water is uncountable but atoms are not. Congratulations. What a strange pedantic hill you choosing to die on.

                • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  No, water is countable. Unfortunately you are incorrect.

                  EDIT: the word “water” isn’t usually made plural, but water the substance can absolutely be measured and counted.

                  • stoly@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Sorry but some nouns (ie cats) can be counted while others (ie air) cannot be.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          If there are two bike lanes merging into one, there are one, two or three bike lanes?

          Water isn’t countable but lanes are.

          What question are you answering?