As the title states I am confused on this matter. The way I see it, the USA has a two party system and in the next few weeks they’re either going to have Trump or Harris as president, come inauguration day. With this in mind doesn’t it make sense to vote for the person least likely to escalate the situation even more.

Giving your vote to an independent or worse not voting at all, just gives more of a chance for Trump to win the election and then who knows what crazy stuff he will allow, or encourage, Israel to get away with.

I really don’t get the logic. As sure nobody wants to vote for a party allowing these heinous crimes to be committed, but given you’re getting one of them shouldn’t you be voting for the one that will be the least horrible of the two.

Please don’t come at me with pro-Israeli rhetoric as this isn’t the post for that, I’m asking about why people would make such choices and I’m not up for debate on the Middle East, on this post, you can DM me for that.

Edit: Bedtime here now so will respond to incoming comments in the morning, love starting the day with an inbox full 😊.

Edit 2: This blew up, it’s a little overwhelming right now but I do intent on replying to everybody that took the time to comment. Just need to get in the right headspace.

  • Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It changes, yes, because it would be America and Israel doing it. I don’t think “more bombs falling on Gaza than before is worse” should be a complicated stance

    • IHave69XiBucks@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      How is it more? Where are these more bombs coming from? The Pentagon already admits they are using too many and cant keep up.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Apart from the ability to increase production, I did literally just answer this in our other chat