• superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    29 days ago

    No, there are 2 spots where cars turning right cross a cycle lane going straight, without a traffic light.
    One of them is on the lakes coming from the left, the other on the lanes in the background coming towards the viewer.

    • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      Theres a rule that no one follows on the roads, when turning right (or left for that matter) you come to a complete stop and then proceed. This applies even if there is no stop sign or the light is solid green.

      The only exception to this is if your signal light shows a green arrow pointing right, or left.

      The location in the image pointed out above tells motorists they can proceeded at full speed, run over the pedestrian at the crossing, run over the cyclists (that has the right of way), and drive head first into traffic in a effort to murge as quickly as possible.

      There should (at the minimum) be painted yeild the right of way marking on the road. Both before the pedestrians crossing at the off ramp and right before the bike lane crossing, which should be painted continuously.

      Kind of like this. 1000015681

      Though paint is no substitute for proper roadway design.

      • deranger@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Theres a rule that no one follows on the roads, when turning right (or left for that matter) you come to a complete stop and then proceed. This applies even if there is no stop sign or the light is solid green.

        Can you cite this law? I’ve never heard of this. You have to yield to pedestrians, but coming to a complete stop for a right on green seems excessive. I’ve not once seen this, nor heard this is how it’s supposed to work. Right on red, sure. Same with left on green, why would you come to a complete stop and potentially get rear-ended?

        Found this article which says it’s not true in Canada:

        https://www.theglobeandmail.com/drive/mobility/article-when-must-drivers-come-to-a-complete-stop-before-turning-right-on-a/

        • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          Its been many years since my driving school courses and being taught by the instructors in car, but seem you may be correct in the laws ambiguous wording on this after I did some reading myself.

          Personally the instructors and the driving test individuals that I talked with (years ago) all stated that its prudent to treat intersection as if there were always the possibility of a pedestrians, cyclists, or other car being there. This meant that you would always slow down, stop, and yeild the right of way.

          Reading this handbook in my local area, diagram 2-20 states this.

          “At any intersection where you want to turn left or right, you must yield the right-of-way. If you are turning left, you must wait for approaching traffic to pass or turn and for pedestrians in or approaching your path to cross. If you are turning right, you must wait for pedestrians to cross if they are in or approaching your path (Diagram 2-20). You should also check your blind spot for cyclists approaching from behind, particularly in a bike lane to your right, on a sidewalk or a trail.”

          I admits it does not say stop explicitly. Though my driving style after all these years is to always treat intersection (especially those with sidewalks and bikelanes along them) with extra care and always slow down, stop, and prepare to yeild the right of way to more vulnerable road users.

          https://www.ontario.ca/document/official-mto-drivers-handbook/driving-through-intersections