Dedicated wifi for automation allows me to have devices such as Xiaomi Vaccuum, or security camera not phoning home. OpenWRT with good firewall rules completely isolate my “public” containers/VMs from my lan.

Server was built over time, disk by disk. I’m now aiming to buy only 12TB drives, but I got to sacrifice the first two as parity…

I just love the simplicity of snapraid / mergerfs. Even if I were to loose 3 disks (my setup allows me the loss of 2 disks), I’d only loose data that’s on these disks, not the whole array. I lost one drive once, recovery went well and was relatively easy.

I try to keep things separated and I may be running a bit too many containers/vms, but well, I got resources to spare :)

  • transmatrix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an FYI: this set up is vulnerable to ARP spoofing. I personally wouldn’t use any ISP-owned routers other than for NAT.

    • tiller@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not well versed in ARP spoofing attack and I’ll dig around, but assuming the attacker gets access to a “public” VM, its only network adapter is linked to the openwrt router that has 3 separated zones (home lan, home automation, dmz). So I don’t think he could have any impact on the lan? No lan traffic is ever going through the openwrt router.

      • transmatrix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The risk is the ISP Wi-Fi. As long as you’re using WPA with a good long random passkey, the risk is minimal. However, anyone who had access to your Wi-Fi could initiate an ARP spoof (essentially be a man-in-the-middle)

        • tiller@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well, to be honest if someone has access to my Wi-Fi, I’d consider that I’ve already lost. As soon as you’re on my lan, you have access to a ton of things. With this setup I’m not trying to protect against local attacks, but from breaches coming from the internet

        • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          How would you change his setup to prevent ARP attacks? More network segmentation (clients and servers on separate VLANs) or does OPNsense additional protections I should look into?

          • transmatrix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t have the Wi-Fi network “upstream” of the LAN. You want the connection between the LAN and Wi-Fi to be through the WAN so you get NAT protection.

            • Ac5000@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Any way you could update/create your own drawing with what you mean? (Bad paint drawings are acceptable!)

              I ask because I am curious if I am subject to the same problem. I’m not the most networking savvy so I need the extra help/explanation and maybe the drawing will help others.

  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like the WiFi 6 just going out into the ether. Like you’re just throwing morsels out to the peasants.

  • tuff_wizard@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s… not all hand written is it? No one who is good at computers can write that well. We got into this BECAUSE we couldn’t write well, right?

  • half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh God yes, I never knew I needed illustrated self hosting architecture.

    Need more. Could you also add like, a curious cat that asks questions?

  • Huschke@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I would never use an ISPs router for my home network. It just causes so many issues that you can easily avoid by either using your own router directly or if that is not possible putting the device into “bridge” mode and using your own router behind it.

    What are some of the issues?

    The devices the ISPs send out are usually the cheapest hardware imaginable and therefore introduce substantial unnecessary latency.

    Where I live some ISPs also used to use tools that genereted wifi passwords based on the devices MAC address. While this is apparently fixed now, a lot of non tech savvy users still use these old devices that are basically open to anyone now.

    To save even more money, they sometimes deliberately send out faulty devices (as in devices that drop connection frequently, restart for no reason, etc) which is just horrible.

    I know these issues because I worked in that field and there are a lot more unfortunately…

    • tiller@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      WIth my previous ISP, I swapped the ISP’s router with my OpenWRT’s and everything worked fine. With my current ISP, it appears that it’s not that simple to swap the router altogether. But I’ll be honest, the biggest factors are price and number of routers/switch. As I want 2.5gbps, I’d need a router with at least dual 2.5gbps ports. The WIFI6 offering is also quite nice. And if I can’t swap my ISP router, it would just add another device. In a perfect world, I’d have a single router running openwrt, with wifi6 and couple of 2.5+gbps ports (but unfortunately openwrt doesn’t play nice with most wifi6 routers and these routers can get very expensive) For now, my ISP router does the job and I haven’t had any issue (yet)

      • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What are too currently using for your OpenWRT router? I just got one of these and I would highly recommend it: https://a.aliexpress.com/_mq4HxaS

        Get the N100 barebones version because you can slap an SSD and RAM in there for cheaper and have more selection. It has four 2.5Gb NICs and the internal PCIE slot for a WiFI card if you really want, though I would recommend getting a Ubiquiti AP to go along with it.

        You can put OPNsense on it bare metal, or proxmox and then run your network related VMs there instead of your main server. Your choice.

      • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You could spend a little for a prosumer router and AP. I have a very similar setup with a cable modem, edge router X (ubnt), a single UniFi AP, and a service running on my server (this could be replaced with a separate hardware device or Raspberry Pi, but the server is going to be running anyway). It’s been rock solid since I set it up, compared to the WiFi/router combo with open-wrt I was running before that struggled and needed restarting regularly.

      • ddx7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not a net ops person but I had to change my WiFi router MAC to the one from the ISP to make it work

        • bemenaker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Also trying calling them, if you give them your mac they can put it in the system, and then it will work. Time Warner used to be big on mac filtering.

  • Bjornir@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is a great quality post! Congratulations and thank you

    Your home network is not too shabby either ;)

  • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hmm, nice detailed specs on your home network. Mind sharing your IP? For, uh… totally trustworthy reasons. Asking for a friend. >: )

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    AP WiFi Access Point
    IP Internet Protocol
    NAT Network Address Translation
    SSD Solid State Drive mass storage

    4 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 7 acronyms.

    [Thread #100 for this sub, first seen 1st Sep 2023, 11:25] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

      • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That would be a smart idea for the ISP. Sell a 5 gigabits fiber connection but force the customer to use their router which comes with a single gigabit port

        • tiller@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Indeed, the isp router only has 1x 2.5gbps and 2x 1gbps. I wanted both my pc and my server to have 2.5gbps to wan, and I wanted 2.5gbps between them too

          • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            So it’s someone like Iliad

            They sell a 5 gbit fiber but they force their router, and it only has 2x 1 gigabit ports, and 1 2.5 gigabit ports. Most people only use wifi, so they pay for 5 gbit, but use 150 mbit, lol

            (in their defence, for the price they offer this bandwidth (only 20 euro per month), i’m ok with that)

  • Ac5000@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Thank you for posting this with the explanations and great visuals! I am wanting to upgrade to a setup almost identical to this and you’ve basically given me the bill of materials and task list.

    Anything you wish you had done differently or suggest changing/upgrading before I think about putting something similar together?

    • tiller@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I ever need to update any device on the home automation vlan, I’d add an exception to the firewall for this specific host for the time of the update