Oh any help how to get the maximum compression out winrar or a step by step guide would be appreciated. Thank you in advance.

  • freamon@preferred.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    16 hours ago

    TV shows and movies are already compressed. If you try to compress something that’s already compressed, it typically ends up bigger if anything.

    • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Why does it get bigger? I’ve wondered that for a while now.

      I would think that compressing something that’s already compressed would still compress it further but at diminishing returns.

      • MrNesser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Once the files are added to the zip folder your also adding information about the files so they can be removed.

          • cam_i_am@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            9 hours ago

            There’s more to it than that. Firstly, at a theoretical level you dealing with the concepts of entropy and information density. A given file has a certain level of information in it. Compressing it is sort of like distilling the file down to its purest form. Once you reached that point, there’s nothing left to “boil away” without losing information.

            Secondly, from a more practical point of view, compression algorithms are designed to work nicely with “normal” real world data. For example as a programmer you might notice that your data often contains repeated digits. So say you have this data: “11188885555555”. That’s easy to compress by describing the runs. There are three 1s, four 8s, and seven 5s. So we can compress it to this: “314875”. This is called “Run Length Encoding” and it just compressed our data by more than half!

            But look what happens if we try to apply the same compression to our already compressed data. There are no repeated digits, there’s just one 3, then one 1, and so on: “131114181715”. It doubled the size of our data, almost back to the original size.

            This is a contrived example but it illustrates the point. If you apply an algorithm to data that it wasn’t designed for, it will perform badly.

              • Num10ck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                it was crucial back in the dial-up internet days or even earlier trying to fit games on a floppy disk. mp3 and mpeg4 came from this quest of course too.