• 0 Posts
  • 66 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 9th, 2021

help-circle

  • Who supported the Khmer Rouge?

    Who ended up fighting and ending the genocide?

    Who denied a genocide happened until the 80’s, and continued funding the Khmer Rouge until the late 90’s?

    These are all simple questions with simple, factual answers. You just don’t like the picture the answers paint, and want to justify the intentional outcome of Kissinger’s designs and blame the outcome on the victims.

    It sickens me to see people like the person I was replying to and yourself try and blame the people who were genocided for their genocide and to blame it on a economic ideology that had very little to do with the outcome.


  • Count042@lemmy.mltoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlIs Lemmy getting more radical lately?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Did you really blame a movement that basically existed for twenty years after relevance through US (and Chinese, interestingly enough) machinations and support, and was actually ousted by the communist Vietnamese, on a ‘kill the oppressors’ view?

    Jesus, capitalists will say and do everything to blame the consequences of their actions on everyone else.





  • Good job responding to something I didn’t say to try and discredit what I did.

    Don’t think that goes unnoticed.

    I’m not excusing Hamas. The fact that you read what I did says that you are either responding in bad faith, didn’t read my response very carefully, or are stupid. I’ll go with the middle one to be generous.

    I don’t excuse Hamas. I don’t control Hamas, and much more importantly, I don’t pay for the weapons that Hamas use.

    I pay, or rather my country pays, for the weapons that Israel uses to bomb apartment building, schools, and hospitals.

    Hamas has killed somewhere between 1000-2000 civilians in this conflict, and that is being generous because we know that a large number of causalities were from Israel enacting the Hannibal directive and intentionally killing their own to keep them from being made prisoners (If Israel gets to grab 11,400 West Bank civilians without trial or due process and call them prisoners, then Hamas gets to do the same). Furthermore, if we count anyone who was in the IDF or the IDF’s military reserves as active military, then the number of civilians goes WAAAAY down. Remember that the IDF considers the trashmen, police, and hospital administrators as active combatants with Hamas affiliation. So, once again, if that is the standard that Israel is setting then it applies to all parties, including Israelis.

    Israel, by all best estimates, has killed somewhere between 100,000-200,000 civilians. That is between 5% - 10% of the ENTIRE POPULATION OF GAZA. In all honesty, the number is probably higher.

    That is completely ignoring the systemized rape and torture camps that Israel has set up, and the Israeli media discovered. Also, something that there is no evidence that Hamas has set up.

    Acting like those two numbers are equivalent, or pointing out that Israel is quantitatively a minimum of 2 orders of magnitude worse, or that the two sides are the same is either stupidity, or evil. Take your pick.

    None of this is justifying Hamas. It is pointing out how much more fantastically, cartoonishly fucking evil the Israeli government is.

    You should ask yourself why you view the above as justifying Hamas. You might discover something.


  • Fucking press the goddamn enter button. Do you have any idea how painful quoting you to respond on a phone is?

    proposed a “peace plan” that was actually just carving up Palestine into a bunch of little pieces that could never constitute a viable state and giving Israel control of the paths between, effectively wishing to formalize Israeli control of the entire region)

    What do you think the situation is now?

    From my point of view, any action that brings him closer to getting back in power is asking to throw gasoline on a genocidal fire,

    What practical changes do you think that Trump will make that could speed things up?

    What actions do you actually think Biden is taking to slow things down.

    From my point of view, any action that brings him closer to getting back in power is asking to throw gasoline on a genocidal fire, and saying that one’s motive for doing so is being against genocide is sickening in the kind of way that it would be if you saw someone suggest that Hitler should have won ww2 because of all the evil stuff that Winston Churchill was responsible for. Consider for a second what people making your argument look like, from that lens.

    This is the wrong analogy.

    The analogy that you are arguing is to vote for Gregor Strasser as an moderating influence on the Nazi Party.

    Consider for a second what people like making your argument look like, from that lens.

    I’m impressed you are aware of the intentional genocide of 4 million Indians caused by Churchill. I am not impressed by your apparent lack of awareness of other lessons from that same time period.

    I’m also not impressed by people that believe they can protect their outgroup by backing someone happy committing genocide.

    The Democratic party has long signaled it would be happy to throw out the T to protect the LGB. Those that think it would stop there need to re-read this poem:

    First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
         Because I was not a socialist.
    
    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
         Because I was not a trade unionist.
    
    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
         Because I was not a Jew.
    
    Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
    



  • Genocide is currently happening with the full support and speed of the US government.

    Without resorting to platitudes, or general statements, what specific actions do you think Biden is taking to limit things?

    Without resorting to platitudes, or general statements, what specific actions do you think Trump will take that will worsen the already existing systemic rape, torture, and murder of the Palestinian people?

    There is no harm minimization for genocide.

    People that believe there is have forgotten all historical lessons.

    Please read this Nazi Era poem and consider its meaning:

    First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
         Because I was not a socialist.
    
    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
         Because I was not a trade unionist.
    
    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
         Because I was not a Jew.
    
    Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
    

    Those who make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. The absurdity here is believing someone willing to commit genocide against others will protect whatever out group you want to protect that you believe (probably accurately) Trump will go after.

    The battle against fascism has already been lost. There is no reform possible from within to fix it.