100%

If there are enough prisoners that they would create a large enough voting bloc that they could get someone elected, then that means there is something fucked up with the legal system. If there aren’t that many, then what’s the big deal allowing them to vote?

Sure, absolutely. Which is part of the reason I think it’s bad to give the justice department this kind of power.

Because let’s be honest, this is 100% a case of community self defense.

That’s not how self defense laws work, for good reason. Self defense requires imminent threats, and we’ve established this for centuries as the way it should be.

Absolutely the people should be able to elect a felon. This is how the law should absolutely work. Imagine how bad it would be if they could just remove political rivals by getting the justice department to catch them in some bs felony, or even frame them for something. The real travesty is that we allow the state to remove the right to vote for a felony conviction.

Your link is Clinton saying she won’t say before the primary is over whether she would support Sanders. It’s not even her saying she wouldn’t do it, let alone all liberals saying it.

The amount of disinformation spread here is amazing.

Regular doors with handles don’t fail open, there is just an Intuitive and common way to manually open them, which seems like the short coming here.

You really can’t think of anything more obviously a case of treason than what you believe trump has done?

The guy is loyal only to himself, no doubt. But, I don’t even see how it would fit this definition at all, and I can easily come up with many things more obviously a violation. Also keep in mind that Russia is not an enemy; we are not at war with them. They are an adversary.

I mean, isn’t that the definition of a traitor?

The definition of treason is very clear and very narrowly defined in the COTUS, and this does not meet the definition.

I’m not as doomer as everyone else for the short term. It’s the long term I’m worried about. He might get 2 more scotus members, and he’s going to do everything in his power to undercut any attempt to tackle climate change. And that includes his scotus picks who will almost certainly declare any needed attention to address climate change as unconstitutional.

This is a terrible apology. You make it all about then instead of your actions and then don’t even say you won’t do it, but only that you’ll try to do it…and then immediately dropping the f bomb throwing out the window any chance that you’re “trying” means anything.

I read this and was like “10 bucks says it’s just alphabetical” and, lo and behold, it’s just alphabetical. How is that not the obvious answer?

They haven’t even started counting yet.

You need to take a fucking chill pill, my man.

https://www.realclearscience.com/journal_club/2014/07/23/sit_or_stand_how_should_men_pee_108761.html

It only sounds like a contradiction if you take “pro-life” literally. In fact, I find this hard to understand at all if you simply just listen to pro-lifers.

Let me be clear, I’m about as firm a supporter of a woman’s right to choose as they come. I’m also adamantly against the death penalty. Do you find this position to be contradictory?

However, the general position of “pro lifers” does not contradict this at all, pretty obviously. They think that a fetus is a child that hasn’t been born yet, and because it hasn’t been born, it’s completely innocent. So you have no right to take it’s life. However, if some person in life has done something in life that removes that innocence, they believe sometimes that rises to such a heinous level that they must be permanently and irrevocably removed from society.

There are other glaring contradictions in their position, like not wanting to provide support to that innocent baby once it has come into the world, but this is clearly not one of them.

I think this has long since debunked and it’s actually the other way. At the very least it’s inconclusive.

“doing real labor” “easy, sweatless, office job” “the actual wheel turners”

“I dislike the condescending attitude”

It never ceases to amaze me how often people see and hate shit in other people that they epitomize themselves.

And honestly, my experience has been the opposite and I see the condescending attitude, at least more openly, coming from blue collar workers more often.

Whether you’re trolling or if this is real, you need help.

Since for me I actually am a kemonomimi.

No, you’re not. That’s the whole point.

I am really curious why being a kemonomimi is a mental illness.

Because you’re not kemonomimi, you’re a human, they are fictional. If you were just dressing up as one for fun, or it was a kink, that would be one thing.

But this appears to be much more, you believe you are one and/or are trying to live your life as one. This is not healthy.

You seem to recognize, in the post and some of your replies, that this is the result of trauma. It’s not some healthy part of who you are, it’s an unhealthy trauma response.

I don’t think there is anything inherently wrong with what you’re doing, but the reason why people don’t take to it well is because you’re exhibiting a mental illness.

You need psychological help more than you need to worry about people accepting this.

Lol what the fuck? Why on earth would anyone get a license if there were no punishment for not having one? Also I assure you that they didn’t get pulled over for having no license; they were breaking another driving law.