• 2 Posts
  • 311 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 23rd, 2023

help-circle












  • Oh, yeah, I understood that - it was the fact that this is for the everyday “consumer” (for consumers) tech that inspired the comment, that regular folk will get up & personal with such tech soon & make it a regular mundane chore.

    I could think about how much electricity an electric plant produces (& couldn’t comprehend it in daily terms that would make sense), but sitting in a charging car you get a much clearer picture of what that means, of how much energy (and “how much driving”) is running through that cable every second, etc.





  • Shifting “blame” on these white-collar police dogs (megacorp CEOs) instead of shareholders (and the system demanding growth) only needs to happen when everyone understands that even 96m is 2.6% of 3.760m of net income (2024).

    So if 1k people were let go all of them could have gotten 1m of bonus and still the company would have made almost 3bn.

    But they were let go bcs yoy income (but not revenue) was lower last year, and the financial markets demand a sacrifice (literally any action, even if not actually needed, just to send a signal they are ‘on it’).

    The usual “efficient” meat grinder stuff.



  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.eetoEconomics@lemmy.mlWe live in the capitalocene
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    People have the ability to choose to not damage “the host”?

    So we do it willingly?
    “Many” when talking for a species is meaningless.

    Some brain cancers might heighten some of the brains abilities … yet I don’t think that matters.

    Also which humans don’t negatively affect kilometres of Earth’s surfaces and species for 100s of thousands of years?

    Beavers, or any species really, can and do affect experientially all they can. They do that until they are in equilibrium with the ecosystem. Invasive species are perhaps a more clear example of this process.

    The relative speed of the process and how fast the environment responds is crucial in the infestation definition.

    In any population the initial growth is basically limited only by the resource availability. So any species at some point, especially at the beginning, behaves (and it’s evolutionary beneficial to do so) like an infestation, the limits come from the environment, and in complex environment that means other species. That’s how ecosystem grow from single species to complex interaction between 1000s of species in more or less stable equilibrium.


  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.eetoEconomics@lemmy.mlWe live in the capitalocene
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    So my next question is, isn’t what we’re doing as a species more or less natural?

    It is, imho, and “infestations” are indeed a normal part of ecosystems.
    Only few species had global impact tho (and none in the timeframe of a geological second), we arent the first.

    infection has too many negative connotations that are unfair.

    I would say that we embody (literally) all of those negative connotations actually, ofc with some weirdness, like how many billions of chickens now live bcs of us.

    I do struggle to find positives in our interaction an consequences to the planets ecosystems.

    What gives us the audacity to justify the loss of biodiversity on such a grand scale?