Lol dangerous?

I don’t understand the hate for voyager. Sure it had some problems, but I thought it was great. Both at the time and looking back on it

That’s not uncommon for doctors offices and such

Fucking goats?

The web is literally unusable without ad blockers. Your question is like asking “why should I stop bashing my face into the wall?”

If the universe is finite and there’s nothing infinite beyond, infinite concepts cannot exist.

But how are mirrors real if your eyes don’t exist?

See. I can post nonsense too

It doesn’t have to be fully unique either. How about revisiting the delta quadrant?

I just want a new series like voyager. Taking place in the future (not prequels), doing something unique, having a cohesive progressive storyline but not necessarily extremely serialized like picard, and with new characters

people who’s action involves sitting

Does no one have editors anymore? Wtf

More money means more people saw it. That’s it, whether you care is up to you

You know just enough to do it the wrong way apparently

For anyone reading this, please don’t follow this advice. It’s terrible and basically security through obscurity

https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/cd59217a-fe1d-468f-8f2d-4cfb4671e49b

Any media that depicts children as sexual is promoting pedophilia

What a terrible take. The same way that violent video games promote violence and is harmful to children?

Children are not sexual

No children are involved

Catering to their fantasies emboldens them to act.

There is 0 evidence of this, and some evidence to the contrary. Having an outlet that involves 0 victims is beneficial. But even still, there are people that are into this that have 0 interest in actual children. Because it’s just a fantasy, the same way that people have rape fantasies.

Yes, sexualizing real children’s bodies is wrong. Sexualizing 3d images of fantasy things is always OK because it’s not real

By the way, just because these are digital renderings does not mean that there is no harm. Seeing such content can still be harmful to past victims.

This is true of literally everyone and any one. Anyone can be victimized by anything and be traumatized by seeing it. That’s not a reasonable argument to throw around accusations of child abuse.

They specifically called it “child abuse content”, not “child abuse”. This seems perfectly valid, no?

No, this is not valid. MAYBE if they added “fictional child abuse content” or something, but even that would be misleading. There’s no child, so it can’t be child abuse, and thus can’t be child abuse content.

It also normalizes pedophilia

No it doesn’t. Only in the same way that violent video games or bdsm normalize actual violence.

Calling this child abuse is what’s fucking disgusting. This is adults role playing with fucking digital renderings. Literally no children involved. Go clutch pearls elsewhere

It exists because we wouldn’t be here if it didn’t. That’s all there is to it really. You’re asking for an answer if “why”. Why did the earth form in the exact place that it did? Things are allowed to arise randomly, and natural selection isn’t an explanation for the begging of the universe

As soon as you got your first billion, you pretty @uch can’t lose it anymore on the market.

We not talking about billionaires. That’s the whole point. You’re so focused on “class analysis” and fitting into your predefined terms that you can’t even see that the whole point of the discussion is that there’s not a clear delineation between classes, which is precisely why “middle class” is important.

You’ve brought up “human nature” and I refuted your argument

In what way have you refuted anything?