I quikly gave up on correting those bots. Either you’re lucky and made a prompt that induced it to generate a decent answer. Or you’re not, and there’s no point in correcting it. In that case you’re better off doing whatever you were going to do without a LLM.
I wasn’t familiar with Drop Site News and had a quick look, seems legit:
Requirements do specify a number of ~8x18 ft cat parking spaces. The regulation mention the space needed to park a car, rather than the word “car”, to make things precise and consistent. See https://www.munistandards.com/ca/los-angles/parking-requirements/
Good point on the overall transport infrastructure. Parking is necessary but not sufficient. Parking requirements and urban planning should work in pair to make the city human and bicycle-friendly. It won’t happen overnight, so better start soon.
Requiring car parking space around a building means there’s more space between building, ie buildings are further part. So the parking requirement itself contribute to city sprawl.
I assume this is about eliminating car parking requirements.
What about changing the parking requirements to be vehicle agnostic? Require construction projects to have parking for X people, rather than X cars, and consider the requirement met if it’s a mix of bicycle parking, cargo bicycle parking, and car parking.
Bicycle parking takes less space. So that’d be an incentive to deliver projets with more bicycle parking, and should help reduce housing cost.
California may not be bicycle-friendly, but it has to start somewhere to be. A colleague of mine used to commute to work in that area using an electric bicycle, it helps cover more distance than a classic bicycle.
A well informed, technicality litterate, reasonable person wouldn’t.
Many reasonable people start/keep using those products. All of this is somewhat obvious for tech hobbyist. Others may not be fully aware or the risk, or don’t consider they’re particularily at risk. The norm is to use those services and apps. There is strong peer pressure to use those service to stay connected with people and organisations.
There’s a need for more or at least better education around being safe online, and protecting personal data. An education that’s free of big tech influence/sponsoring.
This is an interesting example of narrow-AI working well on a problem it was specifically trained for.
Too bad people are going on wild goose chase trying to build AGI using LLM, creating more problems than they’re solving. Narrow AI are easier to build, people know how to build them, and they typically give better results, but they don’t get as much attention or money. It’d be willing to pay a subscription to access a collection of decent narrow AIs that works well for specific tasks, but not LLM that do many thing poorly.
Good luck to Ukraine.
I wish they didn’t publicise details on how the mines were discovered, and how they were destroyed. It’s an interesting read, but the Russian army may also find this intetesting.
That’s awesome.
Don’t stop there. The transition to renewables and electrification could also help, by reducing the import of oil, gas, and coal from Russia.
There’s opposition from some EU countries to sanctions against Russia. Hungary and Slovakia for instance still depend on Russian oil gas, and are blocking or delaying sanctions. Other countries import Russian gas https://www.financial-world.org/news/news/financial/28200/hungary-and-slovakia-oppose-eu-sanctions-aiming-to-halt-russian-energy-imports/
This dependance on fossil fuel is putting the EU in a terrible situation where it imports from its agressor. Those billions of import contribute to Russia’s budget and war effort.
Reducing import and reliance on fossil fuel from Russia, or elsewhere, is as important as helping Ukraine defend itself.
How soon can those help cleanup Fukushima and Tchernobyl?
I assume the high price and limitations would make them a hard sell for a typical factory. But those could be handy in places where humans can’t go safely.
In Tiktok’s case, it has been shady for years.
There were already reports Tiktok censoring dissent in 2019 when it started gaining popularity internatinally:
And even before that, Tiktok’s parent company always operated and had its headquarter in China, so it’s forced to comply with the Great Firewall of China, and participate though their own moderation/algorithm.
Relying on a media that operate (in part) in a totalitarian state with heavy handed censorship is foolish. Even if they have some infrastructure elsewhere, it’s sowned by and answering to ByteDance management. Like all media companies from that country, it’s under pressure from the local and/or central government.
How about not using a platform that supress information about dissent?
This is super shady, how can people trust this app?
I have mixed feeling about this.
20% would definitely be justified for having to take care of bad quality spaghetti code that is the result of vibe coding.
That’s not a clone. It’s a text prediction tool that use a dead person’s messages as input. It’s analoguous to editing together old videos to do a fake interview of a dead person.
The BBC is going for sensationalism. It’s a topic worth covering and they’re not doing it well. Journalists should focus on informing more than entertaining.
According to three Unit 8200 sources, the cloud-based storage platform has facilitated the preparation of deadly airstrikes and has shaped military operations in Gaza and the West Bank.
I wonder if Microsoft will have to testify in the ICC.
Why are these people tolerated in events for global treaty negociation?
It’s obvious they’re only there to undermine regulations and apparently harass experts on the topic.
Update: I should have read the article before commenting. UNEP has no policy to prevent conflit of interest, and lobbyist are buying influence every way they can.
Yep, using ChatGPT is a way to increase one’s environmental footprint.
And the energy cost doesn’t appear to be fully passed to users yet, as OpenAI isn’t profitable yet. There are even free LLM services. So users don’t have an insentive to prefer less polluting alternatives, such as classic search engines.