3·
2 days ago- https://http.cat/451
- https://http.dog/451
- https://httpcats.com/451
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 18th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Spot the difference:
No IPTV is not a crime
No, IPTV is not a crime
Post title should add a comma.
The lawsuit is not about downloading, but about enabling circumventing protections.
By your analogy, it’s not about the shops selling kitchen knives, but hosting a side door to a protected weapons/knifes shop.
(I hate analogies. In general. But wtf is that analogy now that we included more context?)
lower and higher court are different people
What logic do you mean?
Images are typically not encrypted with protection measures [in transit].
they can and will take it away
The example you give is more “have to take down because of legal requirements” than “can and will”.
If you downloaded it you still have it though. Which is the big difference.
YouTube channels can be terminated for both repeated copyright infringement and community guideline violations. In these cases, revenues are often withheld as well. It’s possible, however, that linked AdSense accounts are treated differently.
AdSense policies can be confusing, but based on additional information provided by Google’s AI, YouTube copyright bans are most likely to result in AdSense terminations too.
This is the first time I read of an AI as a source / AI being a source for an article.