Its obvious. California has barely any enforcement of traffic laws. You can pretty much do whatever you want on most highways and not fear getting pulled over. Never seen more people driving without plates too.

Follow lots of communities

They gave him emergency tariff powers. Idiots.

Until I have the same unlimited upside as a founder does, I’m committed to work life balance. If you’re a wage employee, there is not point in giving your life to your job.

Why the fuck is the media suppressing them?

The guy had the option to sell like $1 billion of his ownership stake in Twitter when Musk bought it, but instead left it in. He also supported the Musk takeover. Guy is a fool.

I think you’re missing that we are being deeply manipulated by hoards of foreign influence campaigns. Social media has exploded propaganda in the US and divided the population. Some of this propaganda also comes from internal sources.

As if we needed further proof

Absence of government; the state of society where there is no law or supreme power; a state of lawlessness; political confusion

https://gcide.gnu.org.ua/?q=Anarchy&define=Define&strategy=.

Whatever you’re arguing for, I’d suggest using another word

Absence of government; the state of society where there is no law or supreme power; a state of lawlessness; political confusion.

https://gcide.gnu.org.ua/?q=Anarchy&define=Define&strategy=.

What makes me think that is an anarchist community eschews political organization. There would be no way to arrange a competent defense.

Similar thoughts, trying to decide where to go

What is anarchy then? Is it not some state in which everyone agrees not to take power?

Correct. So, what happens when you have, as you say, pure anarchy without rulers and then some folks interested in power notice that you have no organized way to defend yourself? They take the power easily. These people are often warlords. That’s why anarchy is so closely associated with such things, because anarchy is a power vacuum. That vacuum is easily filled. The most rudimentary thing that can fill it are warlords.

I don’t even understand the point you’re trying to make.

Why are they a myth?

? No, power vacuums can exist and are quickly filled by any group with a modicum of power. Look at ISIS. The US deposed the Iraqi government. The new government was weak and those with a stockpile of weapons and funding from other interested countries quickly swept in and took control of large swaths of territory. They also took territory in Syria after the Arab Spring put Assad on his back foot, unable to maintain power in the east.

No we’re talking about definitions. You’re advocating for anarchy being a viable state for humankind, I’m saying practically you can’t enforce or defend its existence without turning it in to something that it is not by definition. It is practically impossible to defend a state of anarchy as it will and always has been overpowered by a more organized, hierarchical force.

Oh okay, thanks for that enlightening response.

No one will unanimously trust a computer model. People will try to undermine and destroy it. So, the question would then be, how do you stop that? And suddenly you’re not really talking about anarchy. The computer will need to enforce its existence through violence.