Did MS deliver a product through Crowdstrike? Maybe that’s what I’m missing here. I don’t use Crowdstrike myself, so I’m not sure how it relates at all to MS except that it works on Windows.
Did MS deliver a product through Crowdstrike? Maybe that’s what I’m missing here. I don’t use Crowdstrike myself, so I’m not sure how it relates at all to MS except that it works on Windows.
This article is a lot more clearly written, as expected from Cloudflare. For example, the other article makes it sound like 55% of all user data was lost. Cloudflare says:
During the roughly 3.5 hours that these services were impacted, about 55% of the logs we normally send to customers were not sent and were lost.
55% of logs during a 3.5h window is a lot less of a big deal.
Unless I’m missing what they’re referring to, I don’t see why MS even comes up related to Crowdstrike. A software dev that deploys to Windows making a royally bad mistake doesn’t exactly make that MS’s fault.
Indirectly or directly doing it, they still had the same intentions either way (like you mentioned). Neither is anymore excusable than the other. One is just more legal.
I would normally be upset about something like this happening, and would never advocate for it. But then I think about how many lives this person is indirectly responsible for ruining and I feel less bad lol
For frontend, there are cool Rust frameworks like Yew, but if it’s a “real” project then just go with a standard JS framework like Next.js instead.
For backend, Next.js (and many others) can also do backend, but if you want to use Rust, then I recommend axum
. It’s pretty much my goto Rust backend library.
I’ve already started making arrangements with my employer so I can hopefully stay employed with them. It’s happening, just a question of when now.
The other walk is happening too, for what it’s worth.
As someone who does not use TikTok, what reality am I unaware of?
You can’t create a subset of an enum directly, but splitting this up into multiple types works. You can have FunctionAError
with errors that function can produce and a variant for your common errors, and FunctionBError
which is similar:
#[derive(Debug, Error)]
enum MyErrorCommon {
#[error("bad value ({0})")]
MyErrorCommon(String),
}
#[derive(Debug, Error)]
enum FunctionAError {
#[error("error a")]
MyErrorA,
Common(#[from] MyErrorCommon),
}
// and same for FunctionBError
The try operator (?
) will automatically use From
impls to convert errors for you as well. If a function returns a result containing MyErrorCommon
in your function and you use ?
on it, it gets converted to that function’s error type for you. thiserror
generates the From
impl for you if you use #[from]
.
On this topic, I remember seeing a thread for Frostpunk 2 asking if it had DEI stuff in it.
There aren’t even any real characters in Frostpunk 2. Tf are you talking about DEI for in a game with no real characters?
It’s hard to tell what it is you’re trying to do here, but maybe Option isn’t the right type? To me it feels like you’d want to return a type like Vec
or an iterator.
I would recommend looking at some of the iterator functions to do this. You could look at filter_map
, collect
, and fold
/try_fold
and see if any of those help you here.
So, in other words, it’s so users excuse it when it produces dog shit. Got it.
Playing FFXIV for the first time.
I don’t really care for multiplayer games as much since I don’t like to commit my time to others to play games (I like being able to get up and leave when I need to), but there’s a solo challenge that sounded fun, so I’m giving that a shot.
Yeah, the timing of the article makes it clear what the motive is. It’s to distract discussion away from the article about Stallman.
Up to you. Two people can make mistakes at the same time. Whether there is truth to the claims, I’m not sure, but if there is truth then there are some unpleasant details in it.
Is this supposed to be a leading question? I’m not making the decisions, but there’s no reason to be happy about losing contributors in any case.
It’s supposed to put the LF in line with sanctions rather than at risk. They have no control over the invasion (aside from pushing a malicious patch that shuts down all Linux systems or something)
My understanding is that users can edit the chat themselves.
I don’t use c.ai myself, but my wife was able to get a chat log with the bot telling her to end herself pretty easily. The follow-up to the conversation was the bot trying to salvage itself after the sabotage by calling the message a joke.
Nah, that’s not him. We were hanging out that day. That’s not your guy. Sorry officers!