

The same results as flushing all the toilets in your house at the same time.
The same results as flushing all the toilets in your house at the same time.
Americans were never educated with emotional literacy.
Relevant username
We still haven’t found the 297 years from the Middle Ages.
You should limit interactions for your own mental health. This will be unpopular among the more strident hardliners, and I cannot presume to know your situation. Some, if not most of Trump supporters are woefully misinformed. Cutting them off can make them more defensive and further entrenched.
As time progresses, the cognitive dissonance they are experiencing will become overwhelming and they will need a place to land. We cannot confront this with tough love. Eventually some of them will see Trump for what he is, and only with patience and compassion can we bring them over. The time to take sides will come, and we will need everyone who is willing to help.
The visual helped.
Feeding my dog from the table.
You don’t have to learn Morse code.
Comments are locked. This question has been answered.
There is nothing to be optimistic about, so yes.
Psychological science says otherwise. Sure, anecdotally, there may be aberrations. But, study after study shows wealth isolates a person and distances their ability to relate to other people.
Wealth psychologically changes the way you think and feel, so no.
Play Dumb, even if you’re the smartest person in the room.
Eristics aside, I think anecdotal fits:
It is an informal fallacy where a person uses personal experiences or a singular example to back their argument or stance instead of compelling evidence.
Edit: After reading the question again, and trying to understand your thoughts, I think I agree more with egocentric bias.
What does anecdotal evidence mean then?
This is the answer
I love Macro and Cheese, with a little hot sauce.
Stupid questions.
Where did they get the cigarettes? Were they 20 year old stale cigarettes?
Sound guide. I’ll see myself out.