Okay. Thanks for the useless explanation.

So? Did I miss something?

No.

No.

Autoland 🚘🇩🇪

Hahahaha absolutely. :D The difference is, that they come from a 3D printer and that’s cool.

To be fair, you don’t need a very huge 3D printer for that, if you divide it into a lot of smaller parts which can be assembled later.

Idk, if we can already print steel though and whether we can make it structually sufficiently stable.

It’s not just text generating AI, like those transformer models, but also image classificators and generators, time series predictors, and a bunch of other stuff you get.

But yes, even though you seem not to like it, it is AI.

Copilot is no more “intelligent” than Clippy from Microsoft Bob in 1995.

I can’t share that experience.

It just appears to be to people who also have low intelligence.

That’s a bit condescending, don’t you think?

A lot of stuff can be made a lot cheaper than it’s sold.

No.

1. It’s opt-in in my country.
2. I fear that medical personnel will give up on me way too easily and early if they know that I am a donor. Or that it’s even rooted in malicious intent.

You get AI tools shoved down your throat everywhere nowadays. Whether you want it and it’s useful or not.

Flying fucking spaghetti monster! This is a post posted in the community “Fuck Cars” everything here has to do with cars! More specifically, this post criticises cars for their bad environmental impact, contrary to other modes of transportation illustrated in the post.

Why don’t you look it up yourself?

Disclaimer: My comment is just a superficial note on the topic and does not represent a qualified in-depth summary.

Yes, indeed. They would be most useful in rural areas, where public transport is not sufficiently present and could therefore replace cars.

But those are the areas, which are not as profitable as cities. There, decent public transport options often exist, which is why they often replace walking and thereby increase emissions.

But that also depends on particular individual factors like the electrification of those public transport modes.

There is some reaearch on this, for example:

https://www.itf-oecd.org/are-e-scooters-good-or-bad-environment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102680

Yes, because it’s incredibly more dangerous for pedestrians to get hit by an E-Scooter than for an E-Scooter driver being hit by a car. /i

Nevertheless, of course no one should be an asshole in traffic, regardless of transportation mode.

How much emissions do cars cause per passenger and travelled distance?

Even if it were true, I wouldn’t care. If russia does shit, they will have to eat it themselves.

If you are using a piece of knowledge rarely, it is less likely to remember it.

It doesn’t matter whether it’s some word from a foreign language you are trying to learn, a math formula or names and birthdays, even your own, or whatever.

I’m also terrible with names. But then again, I rarely use them. I even tend to forget my own birthday and would miss it if there weren’t people around me reminding me of it.

If other people know their age and birthday immediatly, that’s probably because they are regularly thinking about it. For names it is therefore helpful to use the name of persons you just got acquainted with very often in conversations with them.

If it works, it works.

I am already happy if there is any documentation at all. And I am euphoric if it doesn’t suck, i.e. sufficiently detailed and up to date.

So I guess Discord is better than nothing. But sure it’s a turn off.

Because there is no “experience” after death. You just start to rot.