• 0 Posts
  • 63 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 9th, 2023

help-circle


  • No, that’s the reactionary propaganda doing that.

    Everybody living in this world should be aware that words have context and don’t always literally mean what their parts mean. And even then “patriarchy” is one of the more literal ones: it comes from “pater”/father in the same vein as “paternalistic”, with the same connotation of overbearing-yet-out-of-touch.

    So just from word meaning that clearly doesn’t mean all men, and obviously it also doesn’t refer to literal fathers either.


  • flying_sheep@lemmy.mltoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksFeelings? Nah
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    “patriarchy” in this context means something other than you think, I.e. it means a system that upholds gender roles that benefit a (majority male) ruler class, e.g. by encouraging worker class men to go to war for their benefit, worker class women to be caretakers, and so on.

    The counterpart to this definition of “patriarchy” is a society with no stratified gender roles, not “matriarchy”.



  • flying_sheep@lemmy.mltoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksFeelings? Nah
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That’s not what that word means. “patriarchs” aren’t men in general, that’s why it’s possible (and in fast true) that the patriarchy harms people of all genders.

    As this post demonstrate, men don’t benefit from it, e.g. it makes us live shorter, it encourages suppressing our emotion, it encourages our aggression. Because some (mostly) men in power benefit if we don’t unionize, let ourselves be pressed into shit jobs or the military, and so on.

    Read the other messages here and you might understand.







  • Python is just glorified shell scripting

    Absolutely not, python is an actual programming language with sane error handling and arbitrarily nestable data structures.

    I don’t like the indentation crap

    Don’t be so superficial. When learning something, go with the flow and try to work with the design choices, not against them.

    Python simply writes a bit differently: you do e.g. more function definitions and list comprehensions.





  • Huh, I really like code like that. Having a multi-step process split up into sections like that is amazing to reason about actual dependencies of the individual sections. Granted, that only applies if the individual steps are kinda independently meaningful

    To adapt your example to what I mean:

    Baz do_stuff(int count, boolean cond) {
    	Foo part1 = function1(count);
    	Bar part2 = function2(cond);
    	return function3(part1, part2);
    }
    

    This allows you to immediately see that part1 and part2 are independently calculated, and what goes into calculating them.

    There are several benefits, e.g.:

    1. if there is a problem, you can more easily narrow down where it is (e.g. if part2 calculates as expected and part1 doesn’t, the problem is probably in function1, not function2 or function3). If you have to understand the whole do_stuff before you can effectively debug it, you waste time.
    2. if the function needs to be optimized, you know immediately that function1 and function 2 can probably run in parallel, and even if you don’t want to do that, the slow part will show up in a flame graph.