This worked once because it was so heinously stupid that nobody was expecting it, and they almost certainly still cracked a few eggs to make this omelet. The next guy to try this is going to have a bad time. The next next guy might have a shot.
I may or may not be any number of unfathomable beings.
This worked once because it was so heinously stupid that nobody was expecting it, and they almost certainly still cracked a few eggs to make this omelet. The next guy to try this is going to have a bad time. The next next guy might have a shot.
Prove it then, should be easy if you’re so confident. Go on, I’m waiting.
Even if you were correct, which you aren’t, you have no way of possibly knowing that.
Guy? What guy? That was a pre-existing condition
I don’t know where those are, so have at it bud. I’m sure someone will speak up if they have a complaint.
I’ve been struggling with the opinion for many years now that blowing up oil infrastructure is not only morally sound, but not doing it is a moral failure.
I’m not the right kind of person to get out there and do it myself, but you aren’t going to catch me condemning someone who does.
A McDonald’s manager didn’t condemn my aunt and my grandmother to death in the name of profits.
This IS the attention.
They’d get less shit from everyone if they weren’t predatory liars about it.
She’s 78 and not only checks her email but maintains a WordPress? She is more tech savvy than anyone else her age. Give gramma some credit here.
Antiques? What, like inherited wealth?
Hahaha haha!
The oldest thing I own is my car from 2005
His greatest achievement has been buying contracts that state he has invented things that he didn’t invent.
That’s “jawn” in Philly. It can stand in for literally any object. “These jawns are expensive” “Make a left at the jawn” “Jawn said he ain’t coming” “This jawn is packed”
I genuinely don’t think that would make a difference. No matter which version of those you get hit by a direct strike is going to turn you and your immediate surroundings into salsa. May as well save the construction costs.
Personally I find it silly that bathrooms are segregated at all when stalls exist.
You mean the 3-foot particle board separator with a 2-foot gap at the bottom and a solid inch of space around the entire door, the gap large enough to make eye contact with someone at the sink while you’re sitting with your pants down?
Because that’s what passes for a “stall” in 99% of America. Privacy never even came into the conversation when they designed those damn things. They are designed to give the bare minimum illusion of privacy while still being easily stared through to make sure no one is doing drugs in your bathroom. At any point in time any employee of any company has a right to come into the bathroom, peer through the crack in the door and make sure you’re in there dropping a dook properly and not say, shooting up heroin. And you can’t stop them even if you wanted to, the stalls are designed to make that possible.
So, with that knowledge, I sort of almost understand the people that get all up in arms about this. Because there is almost NO expectation of privacy in ANY American public bathroom. If we had European style stalls this would never have been a problem in the first place. But because anybody can just walk up and literally make eye contact from outside the stall while you’ve got your pants down, some folks can be understandably concerned about that.
That doesn’t excuse any of this mess and it doesn’t make them correct, but non-americans don’t realize how shoddy our typical public restroom is. The anger at trans folks should instead be directed at the cheap-ass building contractors that mandate bathrooms that don’t give you privacy.
Edit: These are what I’m used to seeing.
If you’re tall, your eye level is over the top of that door. If you’re a young kid, the bottom of the door doesn’t even start until your chest or shoulders. If you’re medium height the gap around the door is your peephole, whether you want it to be or not.
anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law
There is no situation outside of basic ID verification where any statement you make will benefit you in any way. If a cop has decided he’s going to arrest you then you’re getting arrested. The proper time to fight against that is in court, not at the time of arrest.
MARS, Inc? Like the candy bar guys?
Pretty much none of these are based in any sort of evidence though. This time we have concrete evidence that our environment is in a runaway loop past the point of repair. We have guaranteed proof that we have already destroyed our planet’s biosphere. The melting ice caps by themselves are already a self-sustaining heat loop even without additional help.
This is not “I declare that Jesus will return in 184 months and then the rapture will happen” like pretty much every other prediction of apocalypse. This is not “the Mayan calendar runs out this year so the world is going to end”. This is not “the Bible said we’re going to have Revelations this year”. This is known fact.
“No, we have Sean Bean at home.”
Sean Bean at home:
In fact, there are particular reasons behind this that are influenced by Japanese culture and history.
Warning: this video is an hour and a half long