• 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 16th, 2024

help-circle
  • The induced demand part involves a cycle of expanding roadways and then building detached housing to use that roadway.

    This would happen with buses, trams and bikes as well but for them the matching housing is a high-density urban fabric, and this is much more frequently blocked by zoning than detached houses. So we get essentially housing crises with incredible prices for quality urban areas as the demand is pretty huge, and some absolutely jam-packed bus and train routes, but following up on that is politically much harder than destroying some farmland or nature area to build suburbs.

    • If traffic is bad then it’s treated as a problem that must be solved
    • If transit is packed like sardines then it’s often ignored
    • If housing that enables a low-car lifestyle is incredibly scarce and expensive it gets waved off with stuff like “it’s not a human right to live in the city” or “but a big building will cast a shadow on my lawn!”









  • This is kinda three different problems, or three effects from one problem:

    1. Being stuck in traffic has a negative impact on health, quality of life in general
    2. Being stuck in traffic has a monetary cost for deliveries and others who have travel as a significant part of their work, e.g. how easy it is for plumbers to get around to customers and warehouses and the like
    3. Being stuck in traffic can have terrible consequences for emergency services

    The solutions, of course, are a mix of negative incentives to drive like congestion and parking pricing, and positive incentives to not drive, like investing in transit, cycling, mixed use and at least a certain level of urban density to be able to support transit, services and not have biking and walking be unfeasible or undesirable because of long distances.