• wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    28 days ago

    I always wondered why they dont use paintball in these simulations. Instead its like when I was 12 playing army with my friends

    You’re dead!

    No you are!

    Nuh uh I had a bigger gun and I shot through your cover!

    No way - this car is bulletproof!

    KIDS!! Dinner!!

    • SSTF@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Because they use MILES gear hooked onto the actual guns. Paintballs would have the exact same issue here of not penetrating a tent that an actual .50 cal would have obviously penetrated.

      Paintball could only simulate relatively close range. Some close quarters training does use actual off the shelf paintball, or more expensive paint rounds in actual guns, but for full scale operational simulation where firefights might take place at longer ranges, MILES is a better solution. MILES also gets hooked to vehicles for vehicle on vehicle combat.

      None of the simulation options are perfect, which is why people in control of it sometimes have to interact.

    • teft@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      28 days ago

      We used to use simunition when i was in. It’s basically chalk paint balls that you can shoot out of your m16/m4. They stung like a motherfucker.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      28 days ago

      I’d assume accuracy has to be part of it. Paintballs don’t fly in a straight line for very far at all, a short enough distance that I can believe it actually becomes useless as a simulation of real firearms usage