fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoCalifornia signs with Stadler for America’s first hydrogen trainswww.railtech.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up141arrow-down16
arrow-up135arrow-down1external-linkCalifornia signs with Stadler for America’s first hydrogen trainswww.railtech.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squareWidowsFavoriteSon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down6·1 year agoFor transportation hydrogen will be the fuel of choice in the long haul. You cant beat its bang for the buck.
minus-squareakilou@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoSeems way easier to build electric infrastructure than to convert electricity to hydrogen then hydrogen back to electricity.
minus-squarehardaysknight@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoSorry people didn’t understand your joke
minus-squareWidowsFavoriteSon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoThank you.
minus-squarefaintwhenfree@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoGotta put /s too many people can’t tell the sarcasm apart.
minus-squareGissaMittJobb@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoWhat are your arguments for hydrogen over something like catenaries? Seems to me like they would win out in the long run on cost and efficiency, no?
minus-squareScroll Responsibly@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-21 year ago You can’t beat its bang for the buck I think they were referring to hydrogen’s explosive potential
For transportation hydrogen will be the fuel of choice in the long haul. You cant beat its bang for the buck.
Seems way easier to build electric infrastructure than to convert electricity to hydrogen then hydrogen back to electricity.
Sorry people didn’t understand your joke
Thank you.
Gotta put /s too many people can’t tell the sarcasm apart.
What are your arguments for hydrogen over something like catenaries? Seems to me like they would win out in the long run on cost and efficiency, no?
I think they were referring to hydrogen’s explosive potential