It doesn’t matter how legal it is or not. If a driver is expected to stop because I’m crossing but doesn’t and I’m crippled or dead, that law means very little to me.
We should instead design crosswalks that are inherently safer. Ones that force drivers to slow down and look for pedestrains regardless of some flashing lights that may or may not work with a beg button.
Raised Crosswalks are amazing!
Hoboken has seen pretty good success with daylighting and “20 is plenty”
Ahhh, the 'ol “I’m too lazy to push a button (in my city wave in proximity of touchless sensor) to signal my intent on behalf of my own safety but roads are still super dangerous so let’s make everyone else suffer” defense.
My way we have these dynamic, responsive systems for high viability and they work great in my city. I can see a pedestrian wanting to cross 3-4x the distance and have tons of time to stop not just safely, but casually safely. They’re awesome and I’ve advocated for this tech in the past.
It’s great tech the city installed for pedestrian safety. Signal intent; Push the button.
Hmm, good PSA slogan.
Edit: Crossed my mind this article seems written to rile up a specific marketable demographic. Everyone here knew the answer before reading anything. I’m guessing doubleclick/google has some more data points on a bunch of us to sell ads to… Just say’n.
Ahhh, the 'ol “I’m in too much of a hurry to pay attention to others who aren’t able to kill me in my 2 ton vehicle. I need someone to shine flashing lights in my face for me to notice anything outside my lane” defense.
See how that works?
The truth is, if things were designed properly, pedestrians would never be trying to cross roads where cars are able to go over 15mph.
Lmao “good tech” my ass. There is a beg button in my town and about 1% of drivers completely ignore it. That is way too many people just speeding through.
I didn’t know the answer because we don’t have anything like this in the UK. Here, we have crossings controlled by traffic lights, where pedestrians press a button and the lights will eventually turn red to stop traffic. And ‘zebra’ crossings where pedestrians have automatic right of way and it is an offence not to stop if someone is waiting to cross.
This seems to be a weird Canadian hybrid where pedestrians have automatic right of way but drivers pretend they don’t know that unless a flashing light is there to remind them?
deleted by creator
I recently crossed over a crosswalk which was elevated to the pedestrian level, effectively functioning as a speed bump. There are clear sightlines on both sides of it. Broad daylight, it has huge signs that say “stop for pedestrians”, zebra stripes, and it’s a single lane each direction on a road that cuts through a public park. I didn’t press the button and instead just started walking. A car was coming but had plenty of time to see me, saw me and stopped for me. But then when I had crossed he rolled down his window and shouted at me that I should have pressed the button. Like wtf dude? You saw me, you stopped. Idgaf about a button, you know how this is supposed to work. Get off your damn phone while you’re driving if it’s so hard for you to spot someone stepping out onto such a clearly marked crossing.
In Brooklyn, it’s the norm for drivers to ignore red lights and stop lights. It’s like they don’t understand this is a pedestrian heavy city. I have to avoid cars while I have the right of way on a regular basis.
did you say these to him too or did you keep your mouth shut to write it on lemmy later on?
I mean I did respond to him, but what I yelled back was, “you’ve gotta stop whether or not the light’s flashing!”
In Finland at least, and AFAIK most other European countries as well the law mandates drivers stop if they see a pedestrian about to cross the road. We have “intention to cross the road” buttons too, in some intersections with limited visibility or a lot of traffic – but by no means are you required to use them. From the looks of it crosswalks have the right of way in the US as well.
I can’t really understand the assumption that people don’t need to pay attention to the road because of some button. In a sensible legislation the driver is responsible for the accident even when the pedestrian is jaywalking unless they literally jump in front of the car from behind a bush or something. If the police rules you had a realistic chance to avoid the collision you, as the driver with a license meaning you’ve had the necessary tutoring, should be at fault.
