Was just talking at dinner with family, and it seems a logical action to ban circumcision, as in most cases, doesn’t have consent, and is a major (genitals are important) body modification. Can we ban it at the state level? Just a thought.

  • frickineh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Maybe it was on purpose. The Abrahamic god is a sadist who apparently fucking loves killing and maiming people, so maybe he was like, “yoooo, you know what would be funny?” and then convinced a bunch of people they should cut part of their babies’ dicks off.

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Wasn’t there also that weird ass bible tale where some dude brought another guy 200 foreskins so he could marry the guy’s daughter? If I don’t have one, at least nobody will kill me and take it from me to give to a potential father in law…

      I still have to give the little fucker a good scrub to not stink though so the cleanliness thing has got to be bull.

      • frickineh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah. I get that it’s supposed to represent how many enemies he killed, but why foreskins, Saul? Could’ve asked for a lot of other things besides dick skin. Like, idk, their weapons or something.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Because you could buy or steal their weapons, but there’s only one way you’re going to end up with a piece of their dick. Also means you don’t get to count enemies who were Jews.