Just wondering if someone was committed enough to make such a movie

  • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    56·
    9 months ago

    There’s the “Seven Up!” series by the BBC. They filmed a bunch of kids at age 7, and then again at 14, 21, 28, etc.

    The first was filmed in 1964 and 63 Up was filmed in 2019.

  • codenamekino@lemmy.world
    53·
    9 months ago

    It’s not as impressive as some of the other projects mentioned here, but there was a one-year hiatus during the filming of Cast Away to allow Tom Hanks to lose all (and more) of the weight he had gained for the first part of the movie. His beard and tan were earned honestly during that time as well.

    • Hurculina Drubman@lemm.ee
      1·
      8 months ago

      the percentage of body weight that Disney made Carrie Fisher lose to come back for the sequels put her at a much higher risk for dying the way she did.

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    332·
    9 months ago

    Not a single movie but that happened with several actors in both Star Wars and Star Trek. Or in Harry Potter. Puberty was good to Neville’s actor.

    It has also happened in many TV series where you can see a kid grow up to adulthood.

    It could have happened with the movie Coffee and Cigarettes which started filming in 1986 and was released in 2003. It consists of several short episodes. But as far as I recall none of the actors of the earlier episodes came back for one of the later episodes.

    • pingveno@lemmy.mlEnglish
      11·
      9 months ago

      Puberty was good to Neville’s actor.

      Dudley’s actor, Harry Melling, also got a fair bit more attractive. Maybe not as much as Matthew Lewis (Neville), but I’ve seen him in a couple of other roles where the makeup department isn’t actively sabotaging his appearance.

  • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.worldEnglish
    241·
    9 months ago

    Flight of the Navigator.

    David Scott Freeman was 12 at the start, and still with us eight years later…

  • kakes@sh.itjust.works
    16·
    9 months ago

    A bit off-topic, but apparently this is one of Denis Villeneuve’s reasons for wanting a hiatus before making a third Dune movie. Besides just wanting a break, he said he would also like to have the actors age a few years for the next one.

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    15·
    9 months ago

    Not really what you’re after OP, but sort of similarish - David Lynch’s Eraserhead took about 5-6 years to make due to start-stop funding issues.

    The story goes that Jack Nance kept his hair like this throughout that whole period.

    • red_pigeon@lemm.eeOP
      4·
      9 months ago

      Yes if it was intentionally and carefully planned according to the actors age. I understand it takes a lot of commitment, but wondering if there is such a movie out there where it is an important part of the plot as well.

      • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeEnglish
        5·
        9 months ago

        Oh. Erm, never mind then. I only know of examples of “I took footage from earlier that wasn’t planned but we realized was usable”.

  • Susaga@ttrpg.networkEnglish
    118·
    9 months ago

    Aged naturally… to play both older and younger… within a single film…

    Given how most films only take a few months to film at most, I don’t think natural aging will have enough impact on a character to have a distinct “younger and older”. If the film took years to make, then parts would seem really low quality compared to other parts. If the character was only a few weeks older, you wouldn’t notice the difference between the accurate age and the reshoots.

    • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      82·
      9 months ago

      Given how most films only take a few months to film at most

      Got any sources for that claim? I was always under more of an impression that movies took at least a year and a half to make, if not 2-3 for a longer movie.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        27·
        9 months ago

        Filming isn’t the longest part of movie production. They spend a significant time editing, piecing stuff together, getting the audio and color balance right and so on.

        https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/video/discover/how-long-to-make-a-movie.html

        For the average movie, the actual shooting of footage usually takes between one and three months. The time depends on the length of the script, but the going is slow. “One or two script pages will take a whole day to film,” says cinematographer Margaret Kurniawan.

      • Susaga@ttrpg.networkEnglish
        14·
        9 months ago

        I didn’t say “make”, I said “film”. You don’t film the actors until the script, sets and costumes are ready, and you can’t edit the movie until after you’ve finished filming.

        According to wikipedia, filming for Avengers Endgame started in August 2017 and finished in January 2018, with reshoots later that year. This was a big Marvel production with a ton of big-name actors doing complex action scenes, so I’m pretty sure this is on the high end of how much filming would need to be done.

        • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
          11·
          9 months ago

          I imagine the average person would take the phrase “film a movie” as synonymous with “make a movie”, even if they are technically distinct. If you’re being more specific with your usage than the typical person in your audience, that’s on you; don’t blame your audience for not understanding.