• emmie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I think there needs to be a verification process to get on blockchain. Some kind of reputation system maybe

    Akin to certificates. Problem is poisoning though or other manipulation. It will be really fun problem to solve

    • Sonori@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      I can’t imagine any sort of verification system not being completely overrun by bots/people on fiver/ mechanical turk immediately unless you tied it to meatspace IDs in an know your customer sort of way, in which case you would definitely need a central organization to do said verification, which eliminates any possible need for a blockchain as said organization can just use a faster, far cheaper, and most importantly for this application editable database.

      More to the point, no one doubts that an article published by one organization was secretly published by another, but rather that they secretly used AI in the writing process, which also negates the system because that organization is never going to tell you which articles are done by AI, and any sort of reporting system for the entire organization or a specific author is just going to be immediately and constantly used to review bomb.

      • emmie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yeah it is very difficult problem, fun stuff

        I’d give a lot to reap the fame of the one who solves it but haha I am well below the skill level

        • interolivary@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well, whatever the solution to this problem is, I’m fairly sure “put a blockchain on it” isn’t going to be it. Distributed ledgers do potentially have some uses, but using them to carry “proof of humanity” information doesn’t make much sense