I know MediaBiasFactCheck is not a be-all-end-all to truth/bias in media, but I find it to be a useful resource.

It makes sense to downvote it in posts that have great discussion – let the content rise up so people can have discussions with humans, sure.

But sometimes I see it getting downvoted when it’s the only comment there. Which does nothing, unless a reader has rules that automatically hide downvoted comments (but a reader would be able to expand the comment anyways…so really no difference).

What’s the point of downvoting? My only guess is that there’s people who are salty about something it said about some source they like. Yet I don’t see anyone providing an alternative to MediaBiasFactCheck…

  • cdf12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    The text needs to be better formatted . I skipped by it a lot at first because it looks like spam.

    Make a cleaner way to display the info

    • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yep. I’m not against it at all in theory but had to block as it’s just taking up way too much space. Should be collapsed to a single line then can expand if want any more

    • otp@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That might depend on your client. It’s a lot better than it used to be with spoiler tags now