Read the link as it does in fact discuss this. I did supply evidence you just haven’t read it.

It’s in the link I supplied. They talk about how it went from twenty nine years old to seventy from 1930 to now. You want to guess what the biggest change was for Inuit in that time?

The fact that the brain needs glucose means your brain does need carbs. You might not need to eat carbs to get that glucose but that’s different.

The fact is we have no idea how healthy or unhealthy a keto diet is long term for people with “normal” digestion.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-003-x/2008001/article/10463/4149059-eng.htm

Source on premodern Inuits living substantially shorter lifespans

Obviously I can’t source a negative that there aren’t dietary studies on people with “normal” digestion doing keto for decades. You can try finding them and discovering no e have been done on your own.

Fun fact they talk about pre-modern Inuit diets in your link but completely avoid the fact the Inuit died of natural causes substantially earlier than almost all cultures. It’s weird how often those pushing keto reference the Inuit but avoid that bit. Modernity has changed this significantly so modern Inuit have similar lifespans to other people.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-003-x/2008001/article/10463/4149059-eng.htm

That’s because they aren’t what I asked for though to be fair Im also aware those sources do not exist because we haven’t done those studies.

The fact that the Inuit traditionally have a much shorter lifespan is a fairly well documented fact. It’s really hard living in the Arctic and it is extremely likely that you do need some plants to live a more normal life. You’ll note it’s never academics that bring them up as an example for how keto is “totes healthy” (again we don’t know if it is for decades on end).

Yes but the fix for that specific issue is fat not veggies

I asked for academic sources for a reason nakely because there is a ton of bullshit broscience surrounding keto. Do you have peer reviewed academic sources? Wikipedia and a pharmacy group’s blog aren’t peer reviewed academic sources.

As an aside you might want to look into how much younger Inuits who ate a traditional diet died vs those that ate more plants. It doesn’t support keto as a healthy diet at all by comparison.

Rabbit poisoning is too much protein and not enough fat.

Academic peer reviewed source supporting your claim that your body runs better on fat please?

Academic source that proves humans can live healthy lives without carbs? Keep in mind no studies have been done on ketogenic diets in people with “normal” digestive systems that have spanned decades.

I suspect you are going to have to dial that claim back a bit. At best right now it appears as if it might be possible for adults to avoid carbs but we have no idea what that looks like over the course of a full life nor is anyone going to run this test on kids.

Who disputes the need for some carbohydrates? Our brains run on carbs.

deleted by creator

If they had provided evidence they would have been giving an enemy nation evidence of the network of intelligence assets in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Those assets would have all been murdered by the Taliban and Pakistani ISI. The USA was unwilling to completely destroy their intelligence networks over this.

While the narrative in certain circles makes it sound like the Taliban was being reasonable, I doubt anyone in the intelligence communities or diplomatic corps are foolish enough to believe The Taliban were being honest about this

Al Qaeda was in Afghanistan at the time not KSA. If I punched you in the face in NYC and then fled to CA sending you pictures from there, would you look for me in NJ, where I live, NYC where the assault happened, or CA where I told you I was? The USA went to the place where the people attacked them were.

You want to ban capitalism. You’ll end up with an authoritarian state as a result of that choice as every non-capitalist state is or has been authoritarian.

So you want an authoritarian state?

Those “competency” tests will be used to discriminate.

How would that be determined?

Whose constitution is “ours”?