• merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Pretty old footage (like a week+ old) but (that was a different sinking oops)

    what strikes me as surprising is that there’s pretty much zero CIWS or other anti-drone weaponry on the ship. You see a few splashes ahead of the drones but nothing indicating sophisticated, or rapid-fire weapons that could’ve actually hit these drones easily.

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.deM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      there was another ship sunk two weeks ago, Tarantul-class Ivanovets. in both cases the same type of drone was used and in both cases the uploaded video was IR so it looks similar. just because you can’t keep up with black sea fleet losses doesn’t mean these aren’t real

      • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Didn’t say it wasn’t real, just that I saw similar footage a few weeks back and thought this was just a late announcement (Sometimes they don’t officially sink for a while).

        My surprise is more that these drone attacks are so effective when modern warships are meant to be able to defeat cruise missiles, but the equivalent of a kamikaze speedboat is able to surpass it lmao

    • _xDEADBEEF@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      at this point, i wouldn’t be surprised rusty SKSs and mosins are the CIWs.

    • verity_kindle@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, you have to calculate how much water and frozen mud the Kuznetsov has inside him. How floaty is “floating”?

      • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.deM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        you might be not far off

        update 2: if my math is correct, and it’s probably a bit off, then ignoring the grayed out ships and counting destroyed + damaged it’s somewhere in the ballpark of 35%

        • verity_kindle@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Thanks for the chart. That’s not many options, when you count the ships that are in maintenance/refitting cycle after an “accident”, or even scheduled maintenance. EDIT: changed “even if you disregard” to “when you count”.