LOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 month agoBattleship reformers are unironically more fanatical and non-credible than A-10 reformerssh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1143arrow-down12
arrow-up1141arrow-down1external-linkBattleship reformers are unironically more fanatical and non-credible than A-10 reformerssh.itjust.worksLOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareFisting for Freedom@sh.itjust.worksMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoPlus the 16" guns can fire nuclear shells. It’s like the Davy Crockett’s big brother.
minus-squareooterness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoImma let you finish, but a gatling gun made of 16" guns is strictly better than a regular 16" gun. See also: This unit from Supreme Commander
minus-squareoptional@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoWhat about a gattling gun using 16" guns as ammo, then?
minus-squareooterness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoSomebody get DARPA on this, stat.
minus-squareDroechai@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 month agoWouldn’t you want the Explosive* payload be nuclear rather than the shell? Seems dangerous for the crew Edited forgotten word to make it clearer
Plus the 16" guns can fire nuclear shells. It’s like the Davy Crockett’s big brother.
Imma let you finish, but a gatling gun made of 16" guns is strictly better than a regular 16" gun.
See also: This unit from Supreme Commander
What about a gattling gun using 16" guns as ammo, then?
Somebody get DARPA on this, stat.
Wouldn’t you want the Explosive* payload be nuclear rather than the shell? Seems dangerous for the crew
Edited forgotten word to make it clearer