Was talking about this with my partner while on a hike, they think they couldn’t take ni more than 8 While I said I thought i could take at least 30. No weapons, just you and the squirrels.

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 months ago

    Everyone who thinks they could take a huge number of squirrels should consider what the jaws of a squirrel look like, how they were made for cracking open hard nuts, and what they could do to you if even one had it in its head to really hurt you:

    I don’t think I could take more than a couple at a time, even if they weren’t coordinated in any way.

  • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 months ago

    There are details missing in this question that matter tremendously. Squirrels are faster and more agile than us. If they are well coordinated, and behave optimally to win (without concern to their individual survival, only the group’s success), I think it would take only a small number of squirrels to brutally murder most people, something like 5. I think their best strategy would be to go for the eyes first, then inflict bleeding injuries and escape again before the person can react. Without tools, and without backup, this approach wouldn’t take long to wear down most people.

    If the squirrels don’t care about their own survival, but make straightforward attacks, I’d think closer to 10-20. The person’s injuries will still compound quickly, but once thet have a grip of a squirrel, it wouldn’t be especially hard to lethally injure.

    If the squirrels still behave like squirrels, and are instead attacking because (for example), they are starving, then the number probably doesn’t matter much, as they’re more likely to go after each other, and the person would have the opportunity to plan and ambush small groups at a time.

    • Einar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      I am not sure whether I should be impressed or concerned by this amount of thought, detail and analysis.

      Anything you’re not telling us?

      • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m mentally well, I just like thinking about hypotheticals. I have no plans (nor any desire) to fight any number of squirrels to the death, and I do not condone doing so as entertainment or sport.

    • eezeebee@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      The person’s injuries will still compound quickly, but once thet have a grip of a squirrel, it wouldn’t be especially hard to lethally injure.

      Personally I wouldn’t plan on gripping them at all. That’s asking for a bite. Unless you plan to just trade hits with them until you win? I’m thinking more of a stomping/kicking/striking strategy to do some crowd control and try to keep them off as much as possible.

  • Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Probably less than I’d like to think. I’m afraid by the time I made the mental switch from “wow there sure are a bunch of these squirrels” to “if I’m going to survive this I’m going to have to stomp all these murderous little fuckers” it will have already been too late

  • potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Do infections count as a loss? If I get an infection from one and die, does that mean I couldn’t take them on? Also, is it one at a time or all of them coming at me.

  • DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    If they’re all ganging up at once, coming from all directions, I feel like it wouldn’t take that many to nip you in the nasties and go for the jugular.

    Assuming there’s some kinda animal instinct where they know to go for vulnerabilities (some animals know to aim for hamstrings and necks right?) I’m not sure I could handle 10 unarmed and in regular clothes

  • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I could probably take down two, but when the third enters the picture I’m toast

    I checked with hubs too and he thinks he could handle forty while wearing jeans and good boots

  • herrvogel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    You said no weapons, but no mention of armor.

    Wrap me in some chain mail or kevlar or whatever, and set me loose. I will rain down an ungodly firestorm upon any number of squirrels. They’re gonna have to call the United Nations and get a binding resolution to keep me from destroying them. I will massacre them. I will fuck them up.

  • crawancon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I would use my human strengths and lure them out in waves by speed walking/jogging into middle of fields or similar open areas. regardless I would get them away from trees or other things they could use to jump down onto me. once I level their attacks to the ground, there I would kick and stomp my way to an endurant victory as they’d surely use some energy to escape where hopeful other predators are there to claim there symbiotic prize.

    This strategy would likely work against 10-20 at a time. a few waves of them before I am cut down. guessing / hoping for 100 but probably only make it to 50.

    if I really got into a squirrel stomping rhythm I bet I could get triple digits.

    ok I’ve now given too much thought to this today. edit: now I’m picturing listening to slayer’s war ensemble and just thrashing squirrels around like a mosh pit of guts and chaos.

  • Delphia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lie on the ground, tuck head into arms protect face and vitals, aggressively log roll back and forth.

    Takes away their extreme agility advantage and uses my mass as a weapon… I think 100 would probably be a pretty fair number.

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    While I’m pretty good with animals, I think I could only convince maybe two of them to come with me in a fight to the death. But I think that’d be enough of a surprise against the other guy.