I don’t know if I’m going crazy but looking at the current situation in the world … please tell me that I’m overexagurating

  • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 minutes ago

    I think it il depend on the military industrial complex in the USA and whether they decide to off Trump or not. If Trump goes isolationist then they’ll probably merc him. If he invades Panama and starts a hot war with Iran then there probably won’t be a world war (ironically). If China invades Taiwan and the US blinks then there won’t be a world war. If the US attacks China for taking over Taiwan then we’ll be in a world war.

  • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    33 minutes ago

    You’re not overexagerating, the property crisis in the imperial core is becoming so severe that there are only 2 solutions, either the people rebel against its ruling class or they side with them and engage in yet another settler project. In my honest opinion, the latter seems like the most probably outcome, its already very advanced in Palestine and its starting in Syria.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I don’t think so.

    Primarily because there’s not economic benefit in it for the ruling class.

    Also, we’ve made the experience of the war in the middle east around 2000 where the USA couldn’t even occupy a farmer’s state for more than a couple years.

    I don’t think anybody realistically thinks they can take over another (big) country in this time.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah, I’d tend to agree. The war is digital and economic. Countries are hacking each other’s infrastructure and commercial systems, mass propaganda and spying with troll farms, tiktok and even hardware. Plenty of fighting with sanctions, tariffs, bans of sales of technology.

      Fighting for land right now is really unnecessary, however depending on how well humanity survives climate change I’d expect to see some arguments going in to drilling and mining places like Greenland, the arctic and antarctic. China is already setting up shop in Antarctica.

      We are also all tied together economically in so many different ways that a war between major powers would be economically devastating for everyone before the first shot is fired, particularly for the countries that ceded most of their production to other countries that might be hostile in war.

  • folaht@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I would say world war is still years away, but if SK in your name means slovakia then comfort yourself that you might find yourself in the early BRICS block vs US empire wars, so hopefully it’ll be over without too much war in your country soon.

  • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    So, WW3 won’t happen until the oligarchy says it’s time. Not sure why now would be the time, but I suppose it could be. There’s like a billion people in the world making a dollar a day, a few billion people only making a few dollars a day… That’s a few billion dollars per day the oligarchy almost certainly thinks belongs in their pocket instead. So I could see them continuing to squeeze the world for every last drop of wealth, which I think will cause unrest in a lot of places. Add climate change to that and I think things just get bad everywhere for most people. Obviously the oligarchy will just go to their islands, yachts, bunkers until a few billion are dead and they can pop back out with their private armies ready to “save” the world.

    A lot of people think they need us to buy their trinkets, but the entire consumer middle class is only like 100 years old, and I think was only designed to keep us distracted while they plundered the world. Now that a small handful of people own everything, and soon enough robots and AI will replace most human labor, it’s mission accomplished and we can go back to feudalism where they are gods and everyone else is slaves.

  • Hubi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    please tell me that I’m overexagurating

    You’re overexaggerating.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Nah, there won’t be WW3. Instead we get countries sabotaging each other via hacking critical infrastructure, proxy wars, propaganda, trade wars.

    I doubt there will ever be a direct “hot war” between the top five nuclear powers ever again.

    WW3 is not what’s gonna kill people, climate change is more likely gonna be humanity’s downfall.

  • SparrowHawk@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I think that the true world war 3 will not be nations against nations, but citizens against their own nations. The stage is set for an actual paradigm shift or system annihilation. We will not support civilization if it doesn’t change, either the people destroy the pyramid or the pyramid will destroy the world.

    • Danitos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I kinda doubt that will happen. For instance, look at Venezuela: Venezuelans are beyond fed up with Maduro’s dictatorship, but there’s nothing they can do against the government forces.

      Governments will do anything they can to prevent a paradigm change.

        • Danitos@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          Yeah, the rigged ones lol. There’s even mathematical evidence of it being rigged, with votes accounting for exact percentages with just 2 decimal places, for every single candidate.

          Venezuela hasn’t publish the official acts, nor let international observers be present in the elections. There was heavy repression on elections day as well, plus some offices not letting people vote.

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Venezuela has been hurt by sanctions because the government was helping the people. The wealthy people of Venezuela don’t like the government because it is more socialist.

        • Danitos@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          53 minutes ago

          It is the poorer population that suffers the most. That’s the reason Venezuela has such a big emigration crisis, and every latinamerican country has also seen such a massive influx of poor emigrants. I experience this firsthand, almost daily.

          It is not rich people that the militia constantly murders/kidnap.

      • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        What revolution really takes is soldier’s that are protecting the system being unwilling to kill when the “rebels” are their family and friends.

        If soldiers have love for the people and see common cause more than they fear their leaders then the leader can fall.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The situation today is nowhere near as bad as the Cold War.

    Think of it this way. All of the 0.01%ers in china, USA and Russia share the same tastes and values. Think any of them are really hot to blow up their nice places on the Rivera?

  • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    In 2001 there was that 9/11 thing and it sounded like WW3 had just started. Turns out, it didn’t. Well, lots of things did happen as a result of it, but WW3 wasn’t one of them. Soon after that, USA was involved in a number if wars in the middle east and it felt like WW3 had just started. Again, it didn’t. Some time around 2010s the tension between North Korea and South Korea was getting pretty intense, and a friend of mine started talking WW3… As usual, WW3 didn’t start.

    At the moment, the situation in Ukraine feels just like all the other major incidents, but we’ll see how it works out. If you expose your mind to tabloid journalism, it begins to feel like the entire world is about to explode. History has a tendency of repeating itself, so I suggest reading about the things that lead to WW1 and WW2. Once, you’ve done that, you’ll begin to pay attention to certain signs and start ignoring most of the nonsense tabloids keep writing about.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      That’s just survivorship bias, you didn’t live through the worlds where all those things escalated into flat out war, you dimension skipping hippie.