• Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Probably generally starting with either an inferiority complex, or being a sociopath.

  • ladicius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Emotions are stronger then intellect, much stronger. And most of these people suffered in bad childhoods and were drilled or neglected into disempathy. (That’s not the necessary reaction to such childhoods but it’s a common reaction.)

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      suffered in bad childhoods

      Just to say, but what causes those things are hate and fear.

      The second one doesn’t require trauma.

      • ladicius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        Fear is a general human trait woven into our existences and should/could be reduced in a loving and supporting childhood. If love and support are missing in your childhood you don’t learn to handle your fears in a mature and stable way.

        (I know I’m painting this picture with a very broad brush. It’s to point in the general direction of feelings as the most plausible and applicable answer to OPs question.)

    • kemsat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      To be fair, those involved in the bad childhoods also are likely to have bad childhoods themselves (the adults I mean).

      • ladicius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Transgenerational stuff, victims becoming offenders and the likes.

        Yep, you’re right, that’s what’s meant here.

    • Don_Dickle@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ok so your telling me since when I was bad in my childhood and spanked with a switch that I can become one?

      • ladicius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        No. Your response to such childhood is very individual. It’s a very common stance to live your life the opposite way of your parents lifestyle. That’s what produced the 1960s air of change in culture - hippies lived the very opposite of their parents ideals.

        I simply point out well researched patterns in childhoods and their influence on character traits. Look up developmental psychology and transgenerational patterns. In Germany there’s a lot of research and publication about “war children” and “war grandchildren” (Kriegskinder und Kriegsenkel) which in general attributes a lot of the countries troubles and shortcomings to the upbringing of kids in a war and post war society with a lot of shame and guilt.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s weird how some people turn into neo-nazis or incels after that and I just pay sexy Russian dom mommies to beat me within an inch of my life.

  • Avanera@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I was raised in a left-leaning, progressive, atheist, LGBTQ+/minority-accepting household, but one surrounded by a white, largely conservative exurban community. I was raised to be inclusive of others, to be thoughtful, to be curious, to be polite and empathetic. I had good* parents who supported me, and taught me to treat others well.

    In the middle of fifth grade, I transferred to a magnet program focusing on STEM concepts. It took me from a school that was almost entirely white, to a school which was very much multi-racial. I was really small for my age, nerdy, and the new kid. I’d always been bullied at school, but after the transfer it got a lot worse, and got pretty severely physical. A lot of the people who harassed me the worst were black. I honestly never understood the social circles enough to know what their deal was, and it certainly wasn’t only a race thing, but the fact that many of my tormentors were black wasn’t lost on me, to be sure.

    When I was 11 or so, I used all the savings from a lifetime of cumulative birthdays, Christmas gifts, etc. to buy a laptop to play games on. Pretty quickly, gaming became all I did. It was an escape, and I enjoyed it. I played whatever F2P games I could. Diablo clones, random MMOs, shitty pay-to-win FPS games, whatever. My parents didn’t supervise my activities very closely, and to be blunt, I quickly became way more savvy than them about subverting any surveillance they tried to put in place anyways.

    Eventually I started looking into hacks for games. I found a really large forum (think 25k members) for sharing game hacks, and joined up. By the time I was maybe 13-14 or so, I was one of the highest-ranking moderators on the forum. I hung out in their IRC server (which definitely isn’t the internet chat-rooms you’re supposed to be careful about, those are different) all day, dabbled in making my own (occasionally illicit) software and hacks, and was firmly in the community. These weren’t good people, but I didn’t know that. When I got home from school and got online, they asked me how my day was. They cared about me, they played games with me, they were my friends. I remember I was gone for like 2 weeks when I was seriously ill, and one of them tracked me down and called my house to check in on me. I didn’t think anything of it, because of course they could do that. I’d been in a Skype call with one of them who was screen sharing the array of webcams they had access to through their botnet. I didn’t realize at the time that they were probably blackmailing people, or holding their data ransom. We just hacked in video games, none of that actually serious stuff. The malware I was toying with was just because I was interested in it, and of course, my friends must have been too, right? Just a learning exercise. I figured I might try to go into cybersecurity when I started high school and could actually start taking courses in computer topics. Programming was SO fucking interesting!

    My parents didn’t know what was going on. They should have. I was barely a teenager, I can’t possibly have been hiding my tracks all that well. But then, their marriage had started to fall apart, and things were bad a home. I didn’t know anything about that then, I was in my room gaming and running communities for terrible people. The headset kept their fighting far away from me. My parents didn’t know who I was hanging out with. They had raised me well, but now they weren’t doing what they should have been. So when my friends shared hateful content with me, “interesting” videos they’d found about how terrible women were, how violent minorities were, who was I to question it? They were speaking as those with knowledge. They taught me stuff, they knew better than me. And besides, I’d been physically harassed by black people before. I’d seen it for myself, right? My U.S. history teacher was REALLY smart, and she told us (in a MN classroom) that the civil war wasn’t actually about slavery either! That was super interesting to learn! And the women they complained about weren’t me. Just because a lot of the guys I hung out with had bitches for girlfriends didn’t mean they hated women, it was just bad luck with shitty women. Right?

    I was a good person. I mean, I was a weird socially outcast nerd, but I wasn’t a bad person. My family was still caring. Still accepting. My Mom’s apartment was always a refuge for any of our friends, even (and especially) the queer ones who had been kicked out by their own terrible parents. They had a place to come and be safe and be themselves with us. So I was a good person too, right? Good people, smart people, they keep their online lives separate from their personal lives. They don’t talk about their online activities with others, and they don’t talk about their personal information with internet strangers in chatrooms. The only people I talked with were my FRIENDS. I ran their Minecraft servers. I discussed the Jordan Peterson videos they shared. He sounds so fucking smart after all. I hardly understand what he’s talking about, but I’m sure one day I will. And the parts I don’t understand, other people can explain to me. I laughed at their racist memes. After all, it’s just a joke. And of course, overt bigotry got stomped on. I was in charge, and I was a good person. I wouldn’t tolerate that sort of thing. But a dog-whistle is just a tool for training a pet, and we’d only ever kept cats.

    I eventually joined a different gaming group on the side. We played Jailbreak in CS:S. I got really good at it. Really into it. And I stopped hanging out as much with my older friends. I still kept in touch, but I’d found a new hobby. These people weren’t good people either, but I mean, the fact that they liked my voice on mic wasn’t that they were creeping on a 15 year old who they wanted to fuck, it was because I had gotten a new microphone a few weeks ago and must have sounded good on it. I had gotten lucky though. These people weren’t great people, but they weren’t nearly as bad. They weren’t literally cybercriminals, just asshole kids on the internet. So when I became a moderator in THAT community and started running things, the community actually improved. But eventually that community collapsed, and I moved on again. And again. And again. I ended up with some Brits for a while, and “mate” settled itself into my vocabulary in a deeply unwelcome way.

    I’ve been incredibly lucky. I’m 28 now. The last 14 years of my life, I’ve slowly climbed from one community to another, and mostly through random luck each of those have been better than the one I was leaving. I am surrounded now by some of my favorite people. They are TRULY good people. They care about others, and stand up for good causes. Some days, I even think maybe I might be a good person too. I wasn’t a good person. I fell WAY down the alt-right rabbit hole. I’m sure that I’ve hurt people, and I’ve made countless decisions that sicken me now. But I’ve been incredibly lucky. If I hadn’t been, I have no idea where I’d be now. Or what nonsense I’d still be believing, because everything around me told me it was normal.

    • Godric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      4 months ago

      You know how they say “Show, not tell” when writing? Excellent job mate, thanks for it

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      4 months ago

      Some days, I even think maybe I might be a good person too

      You sound like a good person to me. That level of self reflection rarely / never leads to being a shithead in my experience.

      Crazy story but a very interesting read. Thanks for sharing.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Genuinely, thanks for sharing your experience. I don’t think most people realize how insidiously easy it is to slowly slide down that path. I’m very glad to hear that you’re moving in a better direction these days.

      Great writing style too, for what it’s worth.

    • SeedyOne@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is a fantastic read and a great explanation of how this can happen. You’ve come a long way and made it out the other side.

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    4 months ago

    When you hollow out the middle class (in the US sense of the term), people go looking for a narrative to explain it, to give them a reason they don’t get (or can’t give their children) the lifestyle they were promised in the media.

    One narrative that fits is corporate greed, late-stage capitalism, enshittification and staggering corruption.

    Another narrative, however, is all this rampant social change going on, people changing the demographics, changing the rules, changing definitions, changing the comfortable rules of thumb they were used to - and now everything’s shit, the two must be connected, we need to slam the brakes and catch our breath, perhaps even go backwards, and maybe conditions will follow suit. Even if they don’t, change is a loss of control, and that’s scary. We need to pull our heads in, hunker down and take back what’s rightfully ours from those we’ve been forced to share it with.

    Once people start looking through that lens, everything starts self-selecting to fit - and they start thinking yeah, maybe those guys had a point.

    Yes, there’s horrible shitty filter bubbles on social media and 4chan and everything else, but this stuff doesn’t take root without the underlying socioeconomic issues driving it.

    As for incels - I don’t think people realise just how much social privilege is involved in having a peer group during childhood and adolescence to develop the give and take of social skills necessary for actually courting a partner. Consider the weird kids, the fat kids, the (disproportionally) poor kids, the ones with a fucked up home life, who didn’t get to form stable relationships, who didn’t get the practice at human-wrangling, who maybe ended up in a socially-isolating job, who had no ‘third place’ to hang out with people, to socialise and to meet people they might be interested in.

    And once people start out without social skills, it can be really hard to pick them up; the embarrassment and exclusion that can follow small fuckups get exponentially worse as time goes on. And you don’t have to be painfully awkward, you just have to… not have game. Just enough to kick you to the bottom of the rankings, so failure (or the likelihood thereof) stacks up and becomes progressively discouraging, so you don’t try and don’t get practice.

    And then it’s the same situation: the world doesn’t work for them the way they were told it would; they do all the things that they’ve heard were supposed to work (but without any of the nuance needed to do it successfully), and it just doesn’t.

    For some of them, they feel like they’re getting singled out to get ripped off, or that the whole damn system is rigged; it’s a big club and they aren’t in it, as it were. So they look for a narrative, they look for someone to blame, they look for the bad guy, they look for a coherent explanation of why they’re the victim here. And of course that spirals out of control and ends up in a very bad place.

    • avattar@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      It makes a lot of sense when you put in like that, and makes me feel like helping people instead of ignoring/hating/looking down on them. How did you get these insights? Are you in the field of psychology?

      • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        As for helping - I think that once they get far enough down the path, there’s probably not much you can do for them. But compassion is always a good thing no matter who you spend it on.

        As is sparing a thought for the poorly-socialised, and for the lack of opportunities people have to just hang out in any kind of casual social setting, if you’re not already part of a friend group.

        Someone works a shit job in a dingy office with three people they hate and no general public flowing through, they’re exhausted at the end of the day and even if they had a place to go they just want to go home. Weekends are for laundry and chores and recovering from the week - and besides, what are they going to do, head to some bar and spend all their money drinking alone, just getting aloner?

        Most of the opportunities out there rely on having either a pre-existing set of people to hang out with, or enough acquired charisma that they wouldn’t be in that situation in the first place.

        Our society really needs to lower the barrier to entry for this stuff, but I have no idea how you’d go about that.

        • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Our society really needs to lower the barrier to entry for this stuff, but I have no idea how you’d go about that.

          I know. At least in the US. It sounds wonky, but think it through: Cars and zoning law. Between the two of those things, there are fewer and fewer third places. There’s nowhere to go to just be around other people. First (home) and second (edit: work) are incredibly isolated, too. You get in the car and pull out of the garage, and interact with nobody until you pull in to the lot at work. At best, you interact briefly with fast food workers for a few seconds at the drive-thru window. There’s no “local,” no stores, no restaurants, no cafés in the neighborhood; you drive to those. They draw from a large area, so you never see the same people twice there.

          Proximity has always been the best builder of community in human history, and we’ve done away with it.

      • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        A little empathy goes a long way. There are some truely shit evil people in the world, but most people are good people who werent given the same chances, lost their way, etc.

  • probableprotogen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    For the nazis, a big problem is the alt-right pipeline that plagues sites like Youtube, along with an unstable political climate, which generally causes radicalization (Weimer Germany is also a very good example of this phemona)

    As for incels, a big problem is admittably a mental health crisis plauging many men, generally causing them to become resentful of women out of loneliness.

    TLDR: Poor mental health and instability

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah the Internet is full of traps that are engineered to draw men in. There’s blood on Google’s hands for just letting that happen. (And probably other companies too, but YouTube is big)

      Related note: unchecked capitalism makes everything worse. Trying to get dates and the apps are just like “pay us $5 and maybe we’ll show your profile to someone. Be a shame if your beautiful profile just never showed up for anyone.”

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        unchecked capitalism makes everything worse.

        Both in the context of this discussion and in society in general.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The latter is aided by the same things as the former. Too many youtubers condition young men to think that women are the problem and the fact that they don’t take care of themselves or socialize with others doesn’t matter and it’s really the fault of everyone else. I used to online game with a couple of these guys who weren’t too bad until recently. They were both basically shut-ins who still somehow held strong beliefs about the outside world and why things are the way they are even though they didn’t really participate with the outside world.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      YouTube but also porn. As it’s much less regulated in terms of tone and content, you get a lot of casual racism, misogyny and similar just thrown into the videos of pene and vagene

  • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Ok, so this is my time to admit my very shameful past. I used to be racist, homophobic, and sexist(known as the big 3). I used my religion as an excuse for the sexism and homophobia and my father(my mom isnt racist and they are divorced) and dam near everyone on his side of the family is racist so I just grew up in that culture. Once I stopped talking to him and met a lot of people from other races, i learned we are all the same. Then I stated reading the Bible, and once I did that, I obviously couldn’t continue believing in it. now I am an atheist and I don’t rely on a very very old book to come to my moral conclusions.

    So basically, it’s willful ignorance, and it is always easier to blame others for your own downfalls, and it makes you feel better about your own shitty life if you can hate on someone else.

    Edited for clarification.

      • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I can honestly say looking back idk if I ever really believed in it. I think I was just using it as an excuse to hate people while feeling morally superior.

    • Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m so glad you were able to see the light and thank you for having the courage to put it out there for others to see.

      The most difficult faults to see and change are our own.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      I used my religion as an excuse for the sexism and homophobia

      I’m my experience that is extremely common.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Then I stated reading the Bible, and once I did that, I obviously couldn’t continue believing it.

      Yeah nothing obvious about that. Your religion is idiotic, all religions are lies made up by con artists or crazy people. You cant be trusted if you need some book assembled over a 600 year period, edited and abused by religious leaders to control and manipulate the masses into maintaining and increasing their own powerbase, to tell you right from wrong.

      Religion is just the old world version of todays billionaires

      • RubyRhod@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        Couldn’t agree more. Fuck a safe space for insane blatherskite.

        “willful ignorance” lol

        Like I don’t wanna beat up on the guy but… fuckin hell.

        • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ya, I was willfully ignorant for a while in my life, and then I started to actually practice critical thinking and developing a sound epistemology. I admitted I was wrong and took steps to change that. So what exactly is there to beat up on me about?

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Im glad they are a better person than they used to be, but that particular sentence made me laugh out loud

          • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            Question: does that sentence lead one to believe that reading the Bible made me think the Bible is against sexism and homophobia or does it lead you to believe that I am no longer religious because I read the bible?

  • squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Additionally to what has already been mentioned: People are susceptible to politics that confirm their prejudices. Right-wing political thought is largely based on confirming that whatever prejudices people hold, they are morally good and justified. Thus elevating an in-group above out-groups. That is a powerful lure.

  • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Consider this question: how is it that anyone under the age of 40 today has ever smoked?

    By the time they were born, the bad effects of smoking were well understood. By the time they were teenagers, not smoking should have been as obvious as not jumping in front of a train. People already addicted find it difficult to quit, but it in no way explains anyone starting.

    The question is different and yet very similar, because the things you mention wind up in a similar way. Somehow people start in that route even though it should be obvious not to. And these things you mention are much easier to fall into than smoking because parents, family, etc are all pushing it on people. Smokers generally aren’t pushing their kids, nieces and nephews, grandchildren, etc to smoke, and somehow smoking still proliferates to some degree, just consider how much more difficult to avoid it is for those whose families are actively encouraging them to fall into these methods of belief and hate.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Somehow people start in that route even though it should be obvious not to.

      Nicotine provides a short term mental stimulus that’s great for people who feel exhausted or have trouble staying focused.

      That’s why lots of people start smoking in school and lots of professionals continue smoking well past the point at which the health effects are obvious.

      I know a pulmonologist who smoked until he was in his thirties. Literally “how do you expect me to do my job without this?” was his response when I pressed him on it. Lawyers still smoke like chimneys and for the same reasons

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      For me as a non-smoker, but vaper, it’s not as if I “fell” into anything. I actively choose to vape and like it. I quit before and did not like it. I get way more benefits from nicotine than downsides. These are factual benefits.

      It’s a poor analogy for right-wing political beliefs which don’t really work. They do not really lead to the goals they claim.

      • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Would i wrong to venture the guess that you didnt like quitting vaping because you were suffering from nicotine withdrawal? I swapped to vaping after years of smoking and eventually quit vaping. It was not enjoyable to quit but i feel a million times better not being beholden to the habit. My lungs feel better, my brain feels better, my stress levels are lower.

        What benefits does nicotine bring other than satifyi g your craving for nicotine.

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Nah. I quit for quite a few months and my withdrawals largely passed, I no longer had any nicotine cravings by that point.

          Then I started having serious problems with academic performance, insane mood swings, etc.

          My stress levels were much higher, I had brain fog constantly and was either restless or super low energy.

          I experienced zero benefits to quitting vaping in terms of physical wellbeing also, my lungs felt no different before or after, but I never smoked, but I did almost become obese after quitting due to the lack of hunger suppression.

          I didn’t connect it to quitting nicotine at first and searched for psychological explanations, but I had no actual reasons to be struggling at the time, eventually I realized it started a few months after I’d quit vaping. When I started using nicotine again via patches, after some time I started feeling like myself again.

          Turns out I had undiagnosed ADHD - now professionally diagnosed so I actually was genuinely way better off on nicotine than off of it, it does the same thing as Adderall (Amphetamine) does as well, but more subtle and in a slightly different way, a combination of both has really made me a much better person, far more rational and just generally way calmer, but also way more productive. I now have an MSc and a decently paying IT career, a stable and healthy relationship, healthy weight and I’m always working on self-improving through exercise, learning or minimizing other vices like cutting out all sugary foods, no more snacks, more veg, less alcohol etc etc. I wouldn’t have had any of this without good ol’ nicotine.

          From my discussions with the diagnosing psychiatrist, this is a relatively common thing amongst folks with ADHD.

          There are a number of studies that suggest Nicotine’s potential usefulness in “neurospicy” people:

          https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5758075/

          https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8741955/

          One study suggested that poor cognitive performance overall being a good predictor for relapse among smokers could actually be explained by rhe fact that nicotine being a stimulant has wide ranging helpful effects for cognitive function:

          https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6018192/

          ADHD or not I can certainly relate. If I had to put a word to how I felt off nicotine, I’d say I primarily just felt like I was dumb.

          Here’s also a science direct article that mentions cites a range of studies, including on that of its positive effects on people with Alzheimer’s;

          https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S027858462300009X

          Drugs are drugs. YMMV. Assuming that chemical X is always bad when this isn’t the case isn’t useful to a productive discussion. Even if you want to dissuade people from nicotine absolutely - an approach that works far better to actually getting people on board is being honest.

          On Reddit, subs like quitvaping and the caffeine quitting one are full of misinformation that is transparently a bunch of people RPing the war on drugs infomercials of the late 80s, not much different from the semen retention pseudoscience folks.

          But also don’t smoke. Obligatory disclaimer but Inhaling combustion smoke just isn’t worth any benefit of anything, not nicotine, not devil’s lettuce.

          Vaping is far far safer and so far is not known to cause any issues, (unless of course you count the tainted dark market unregulated american weed vapes which will give you popcorn lung), though as always, we can’t be sure, so best use something like patches.

          • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            You mentioned it turns out you have ADHD (turns out so do i) and that you began medication for that and it reads that this medication began at around the same time as you started on nicotine again.

            I am inclined to ask the question. Do you think perhaps you are associating the effects of the ADHD treatment to nicotine use?

            There certainly are some documented benefits to nicotine use. And much of what you say is verifiable. However, many of the benefits you describe can be associated with the treatment of ADHD aswell.

            I accept i dont know your personal situation. I only read your comment and noticed the timing seemed to be a bit close.

            On the subject of vaping, i personally experienced some sticky phlegm and trouble coughing this up as well as issues with lung capacity and the dependance on the nicotine made me extremely irritable and unable to concentrate until i vaped.

            Also it takes longer than a few months to break a nicotine addiction. I still uphold the idea that there may have been some withdrawal going on there.

            However i am happy to conceed the point if you genuinely disagree. As i said i have no idea about your personal situation.

            • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              and it reads that this medication began at around the same time as you started on nicotine again.

              No, there was at least a few months between these two events. I should’ve phrased it better.

              Do you think perhaps you are associating the effects of the ADHD treatment to nicotine use?

              No. They’re wildly different in feel. I can tell when my meds wear off and when they kick in most days. That’s why I like having both.

              i personally experienced some sticky phlegm and trouble coughing this up

              This is far more likely due to the fact you used to smoke. I have anecdotally heard of some people who have issues with feeling like their throat is irritated, but they usually have crazy setups, like 300w 4-coil 0.24ohm temple RDAs with 1.5mg nic on a noisy cricket II in series or w/e. I have a hunch that the reason for it. Those were fun AF but I wouldn’t use it long term, it’s the equivalent of thinking that because a bar of chocolate doesn’t hurt you, then neither can a giant dump truck.

              I’ve long switched to the rechargable elfbars with high strength (relatively) nic salts and low vapour volume which I’ve had no issues with.

              and the dependance on the nicotine made me extremely irritable and unable to concentrate until i vaped

              That’s true for sure. If I know I’m not gonna be able to vape I just use nicotine patches, I have no psychological addiction to vaping itself, only a physiological dependency on nicotine, if the patches match my nicotine intake levels, then I tend to forget vaping is even a thing at all haha.

              Also it takes longer than a few months to break a nicotine addiction.

              Yes, in terms of cravings, and those did pass actually, but in terms of such acute withdrawal effects? Nah - something is definitely going on there that wasn’t just pure withdrawals.

              As i said i have no idea about your personal situation.

              You do now that I wrote it out :)

              Either way, have a good day!

      • Charzard4261@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The guy wasn’t talking about vaping though, but smoking. The one we know for sure gives you a ton of issues and health problems.

        Whilst I agree it’s not a great analogy for right wing beliefs, I’d say it works as a good analogy for incel behaviour. I knew a guy who had fallen into that trap but managed to find his way out. When I asked him about it, he said it helped him cope, that it was easier to believe that it wasn’t his fault things were so shitty.

        I really respect how he was able to realise that the things he and the people around him were saying was bullshit, and it made me realise that a lot of these people are being taken advantage of by “influencers” spewing this harmful rhetoric.

  • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Fascists provide easy (but often fake) answers to hard problems. Loneliness, the fear of replacement, that kind of thing.

  • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 months ago

    There’s a lot of information, there’s also a lot of misinformation. Many people don’t trust authorities, sometimes for understandable reasons, so they end up in the fringes.

    Also, the Nazis, and even the Confederates, weren’t all that long ago in the grand scheme. A couple generations. Many people learn these tendencies from their family.

    Also incels are somewhat different from Nazis/fascists. There’s obviously a lot of overlap. There’s always been men who had trouble with women, but I think being a male virgin after a certain age is enormously more vilified these days than it was in, for instance, the 50s, even among more progressive, left leaning groups. Admittedly, that’s anecdotal so I could be wrong.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Part of it is education and critical thinking. People don’t know what to trust because they don’t know how to test information for truthfulness and can’t reliably fact check. So they depend on an authority figure to tell them what and how to think, with expected results.

      Note this isn’t limited to these people; some people just pick better authority figures than others.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      but I think being a male virgin after a certain age is enormously more vilified these days than it was in, for instance, the 50s, even among more progressive, left leaning groups.

      Not sure if this is true, but I’m pretty sure that research says that people were having more sex back then. So probably fewer virgins back then.

      There was less to do for entertainment in the 50s, lol

      • yeather@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Still a culture shift. Back then you were a stand up guy waiting for a dynamite gal to call his own, now you’re that weird 30yo who couldn’t get an easy lay in college and is too socially akward to date now.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    External locus of control.

    Bad things in someone’s life is not their fault, but the fault of whatever scapegoat.

    Can’t get a girlfriend? It’s women’s fault.

    Can’t get a job? It’s illegal immigrants.

    Can’t afford to do the things you like? It’s the government taking too many taxes.

    Whatever problem someone has, they are looking to blame someone rather than make any changes in their own life.

  • giltwist@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 months ago

    The core of the issue is the “Just World Fallacy” sometimes also called the “Prosperity Doctrine” and a few other things. It boils down to one core idea “Good things happen to good people, and bad things happen to bad people.” Basically, everyone tends to think of themselves as, more-or-less, good people. So when bad things happen, as they inevitably do, these people start going “Huh, more bad stuff is happening to me than I’ve done bad things. WTF?” So, they come to a reasonable if flawed conclusion that “someone ELSE is doing bad things, and I’m collateral damage.” This isn’t entirely wrong, although sometimes bad things do just happen. However, since at least as far back as the Civil War (and probably since time immemorial), the people whose fault it REALLY is (i.e., the people with power and privelege) have pointed at outgroups, commonly immigrants but also slaves or Catholics or trans people, and said “THOSE people are being bad. THOSE people are why you are suffering. Give me more power and I’ll get rid of THOSE people.”

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 months ago

    Social media algorithms present different things to different people. So if you fall for a grift, the algorithm will just show you things that support the grift and never show anything that debunks it.

    Someone going down a weird rabbit hole will stay on that for a long time, watching many ads along the way. Someone that starts to think “hey maybe there’s something to this thing” then immediately sees something debunking it may conclude “well that last video was a waste of time” and may decide to go do something else that’s a more worthwhile use of their time. End result, they watch fewer ads. Less revenue for the social media companies.

    Weird internet rabbit holes are more profitable than seeing contradicting opinions. So the algorithms are tuned to send people down rabbit holes and not offer information contradicting them.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I just confronted a guy I know who told me with a straight face that poor people struggle with budgeting and that’s why they’re poor.

      I asked him where he got that info. He then sent me a bunch of YouTubers.

        • OCATMBBL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Payday loans don’t suggest this. Those are predatory businesses aimed at the poor and desperate.

          When you’re one month from disaster and you break a leg, it’s a payday loan or your family doesn’t have a home/food when you work a job without paid leave. And good luck with the disability approval, because even if it eventually comes through, you are on the hook until it does.

          Being poor has very little to do with budgeting. I’m sure a substantial portion, if not the majority of them, could figure out how to budget with a $100k income instead of a $30k income.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I agree. My point was that rich people don’t take payday loans, but i recognise that not being able to afford a safetly cushion doesn’t necessarily imply bad planning.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              rich people don’t take payday loans

              Some do, depending on their circumstances. But when you’ve got a big income it’s easier to get out from under the debt.

              Most rich people just use credit cards, though. They’re arguably worse than payday lenders, since the credit limits are much higher. But they’re also very risk averse, so they don’t extend credit to the lower income groups.

              Payday lenders and other loan sharks have to spend more on collections and run tighter margins as a result. Far easier to be a credit card company and simply wage a finger at someone’s credit rating to extort payment than to actually execute a repo.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Those are predatory businesses aimed at the poor and desperate.

            society is biased to keep poor people poor.

            Seems like you agree

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yes, but it’s important to note that confirmation bias is always present in our views of the world because our brain tends to keep things simple by prefering confirming to contradicting information. It just has been amplified by recommendation algorithms meant to increase engagement by showing you “more of the stuff you like”, thus trapping you in a filter bubble you might not even be aware of.

  • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 months ago

    As someone who used to visit incel communities (though I never supported the misogynist views), I think a lot of the appeal comes from the fact that they seem to be the only support groups for lonely men. Why aren’t there any non-toxic ones?

    • hightrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Few exist, but they do exist.

      The issue is that many times in the past when men have tried to creat men only groups, they get called sexist and forced to open the group.

      Men aren’t allowed to discuss their issues (men’s rights discussion is seen as hate), they aren’t allowed to discuss that they aren’t allowed to discuss men’s issues ( this is seen as hate ). Because men are seen as privileged.

      I fully expect hate for this comment and I won’t engage.

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The biggest reason support groups for men aren’t well supported, is due to men enforcing the ideas of stoic machismo onto men. This leads to numerous things, one is a lack of support for men who are struggling, failing, lonely, whatever. Men aren’t allowed to discuss their feelings because men have created a society that looks at them as losers for doing so. This is, very slowly, changing though.

        The problem with a lot of men’s right advocacy is that is really does end up being misogynist. Most men’s right spaces I have encountered want to blame women for being lonely, for failing to make a family, etc. Meanwhile it is men that have had the primary hand in creating society, and it has been that way for thousands of years. We can’t really affect change if we don’t recognize that this is a bed that we made. If we are not happy lying in it, then we need to change, not women. I am also saying not saying women are just perfectly fine. Clearly everyone can have serious negative issues due to life. However, as it stands, the problems we believe are brought on by society, are the constructs of men.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          We can’t really affect change if we don’t recognize that this is a bed that we made.

          The problem is the men that are struggling generally aren’t the same men that made the bed.

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Obviously, however that doesn’t make it not a problem with men. We still need a collective introspection, and course correction.

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              How do you propose we bring this change about about? The one’s who need to do it have no incentive. The rest of us can sit and think about things and blame ourselves for being men all we want but it won’t change anything. I can encourage and support my peers all day long but it won’t help them be more successful in life or get women to like them romantically because I have no social capital either.

              • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                You have to blame the men in charge, but also yourself, your upbringing, and realize you need to work on personal betterment just as much as trying to help other men. Real help, not just creating safe spaces to bitch about chads, and hate on women. Simply creating a place to support men, with actual counseling in mind, that diverts from just blaming women, will actually make things better, demographically. This social capital idea you have isn’t the all encompassing thing you think it is. I have seen very meh looking men, who were fucking homeless, and jobless, in relationships with women. Having support groups, that are just not echo chambers of hate, and instead are implementing counseling methods, that certified people use, that you have researched yourself (do not call yourself a councilor, or claim any professional expertise, diagnosis, etc. just offer as help, man to man, with the increased knowledge) will, broadly, increase other men’s sense of self. This will increase their personal confidence. This will lead to personal betterment. Then you push to branch out.

                The idea that men need serious fucking help is already out there. Has been for a good while. It is slowly manifesting into society being more accepting of seeking mental health care, men processing their emotions, etc. Like I said, it is slow, but it is happening. If you are so inclined, do real research into the problems men face in society, like academic research, there is a lot out there to read through, and write a book. Maybe start a podcast, or YT channel. Sure you might not get anywere, but you got stuff out there, in the collective space, for others to see. Which is orders of magnitude more than any MRA, redpill, or incel community has done. Those communities just make the situation worse. They blame women, and even when they discuss men in power enforcing this, they just go “well this is a monumental task to change. Instead I will just stew, in this toxic echo chamber.” While they are just making people advocating for reform for the betterment of men look bad. Look for people who want to publicly advocate reform. From the soap box, and maybe, eventually, to the larger public domain.

                • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I do work on personal betterment quite a lot and encourage my peers to do so. As for the rest of it, how can I start a support group or YouTube channel if no one gives a shit about me or what I have to say? No one with the power to actually make changes will listen to me. The rest already know change needs to happen but can’t do anything either so it would just turn into another echo chamber. Yes, a more positive one but still an echo chamber.

        • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          (emphasis added)

          Men aren’t allowed to discuss their feelings because men have created a society that looks at them as losers for doing so.

          The implication here, that societal norms are created and maintained by only men, and therefore any aspects of it that affect men negatively deserve to be blamed on them, is one of the most pervasive anti-male sentiments that people try to fly under the radar with. Women have at least as much (arguably more) influence on societal norms and conventions, as men do.

          This entire comment is teeming with this undertone; that is, until the end, when they come out and just say ‘all the bad stuff is men’s fault’ at the end, lol.

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I didn’t say only by men, there is more comments for context to that statement you are leaving out, I said men have had most of the control through out history, so they have, by far, the greatest influence

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yes, there are instances where men’s support groups have shut down, due to misogyny, and there are women’s support groups that did not, despite being misandrists. Guess who is the primary factor in the creation of this society in which this happens?

    • abcdqfr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      The preferred alternative is a healthy relationship after enough therapy, the latter being a [pay]wall for some

      • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        There are more straight men who want a partner than women, so someone will be inevitably left out no matter the amount of therapy.